ci: centralize governance — remove local workflows duplicated by central .github#118
Conversation
…workflows These local workflows duplicate the org-wide CENTRAL required workflows in ContextualWisdomLab/.github (Security Scan = trivy-fs/osv-scan/scorecard, CodeQL PR, OSV-Scanner PR, Scorecard PR) that already run in this repo's context on every PR. Keeping local copies causes double runs, duplicate SARIF uploads, and duplicate CRITICAL/HIGH failures. Removing them so the central required workflow is the single governance gate. Removed: - .github/workflows/codeql.yml - .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml - .github/workflows/scorecard.yml Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RTAMs4bpSZS77Xe3RQjv9P
|
Order-safe local validation for the current #118 head. Current #118 head tested: Stack tested: Scope checked:
Validation results from the disposable stack worktree:
Design/Figma scope check: this repository is still an R package with no frontend/visual surface, so no UI or Figma artifact is warranted for this PR. This is validation evidence only; merge still needs the required current-head checks and non-stale approval path. |
|
Order-safe validation for #118 on the current prepared queue stack. Current #118 head tested: Local stack tested:
Scope checked:
Current governance check:
Validation:
No PR branch was pushed or restacked; this is validation evidence only. #118 still needs the required review path before merge. |
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues. FindingsNo blocking findings. SummaryApproval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
|
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode reviewed the current-head bounded evidence and found no blocking issues.
Findings
No blocking findings.
Summary
Approval sufficiency: bounded evidence supplied affirmative approval evidence for changed files, coverage/docstring posture, risk surfaces, and current-head verification; approval is not based merely on the absence of known blockers.
Verification posture: CodeGraph evidence was initialized and bounded current-head evidence reviewed for changed-file evidence including .github/workflows/codeql.yml, .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml, .github/workflows/scorecard.yml.
Linter/static: workflow/static review evidence is bounded by the current-head GitHub Checks gate and changed-file evidence.
TDD/regression: coverage execution evidence and focused changed hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Coverage: coverage execution evidence reports test coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
Docstring coverage: coverage execution evidence reports docstring coverage as not applicable because no supported changed source files or package manifests were found.
DAG: CodeGraph/source-backed behavior map connects .github/workflows/codeql.yml to the affected review, runtime, or workflow path and required checks.
PoC/execution: coverage-evidence job executed on the current head and reported PASS.
DDD/domain: workflow and repository-governance invariants were reviewed against changed files in bounded evidence.
CDD/context: CodeGraph evidence, changed-file history, and focused hunks were reviewed from bounded-review-evidence.md.
Similar issues: changed-file history evidence was reviewed for comparable local precedents.
Claim/concept check: bounded evidence, repository source, current-head workflow evidence, and, where numeric, scientific, statistical, or literature-backed claims are affected, original-paper/formula evidence and parameter-recovery expectations were used for claims.
Standards search: standards and external-source checks are delegated to configured OpenCode web_search/Context7/DeepWiki sources when applicable; no evidence-backed standards blocker is present in bounded evidence.
Compatibility/convention: changed workflow/script conventions, object naming, and reserved-word safety for schema/API/config/code surfaces were checked in bounded evidence.
Breaking-change/backcompat: deployment evidence and changed-file history were checked for backward-compatibility risk.
Performance: changed surfaces were checked for performance risk in bounded evidence.
Developer experience: changed automation, review, test, setup, and maintenance surfaces were checked for helpful or obstructive DX impact in bounded evidence.
User experience: connected user, operator, API, CLI, documentation, review-comment, status-check, rendering, and workflow-reader behavior was checked for contradictions against code, docs, and tests in bounded evidence.
Visual/DOM: Playwright visual, DOM locator, ARIA snapshot, console, and responsive evidence were checked when a web UI surface was present; for non-web surfaces, API/CLI/log/docs/workflow interaction evidence was reviewed instead.
Accessibility/i18n: accessibility, localization, and human-readable text surfaces were checked where UI, CLI, API message, docs, logs, or review text changed.
Supply-chain/license: dependency, package, model, container, and external-tool changes were checked in bounded evidence.
Packaging: package, build, test, lint, and security contracts were checked in bounded evidence.
Security/privacy: workflow-token, review-gate, and repository-automation security/privacy boundaries were checked in bounded evidence.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: PR consolidates CI workflows without introducing issues
- Head SHA:
db8a2e23aca72e73bc0b4cb080a197a074659aca - Workflow run: 29064092606
- Workflow attempt: 1
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Workflow (3 files)"]
S1 --> I1["GitHub Actions review job"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Workflow (3 files)"]
R1 --> V1["actionlint plus required checks"]
1 participant
Consolidates governance/security CI into the org CENTRAL required workflows (ContextualWisdomLab/.github).
The removed local workflows duplicate the central required workflows that already execute in this repo's context on every PR:
Duplicate local copies cause double runs, duplicate SARIF uploads, and duplicate CRITICAL/HIGH failures. This PR removes only the redundant governance workflows; functional build/test/lint/deploy and gap-filling security (bandit/semgrep/secret-scan/sbom/fuzzing) are left untouched.
Removed:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code