PSor estimates principal causal effects under principal stratification using a margin-free, variation-independent odds ratio sensitivity parameter, allowing analysis when monotonicity may not hold. The framework unifies the monotonicity assumption with the counterfactual intermediate independence assumption and assumes mean principal ignorability.
The package accompanies the paper “Semiparametric Principal Stratification Analysis Beyond Monotonicity” by Jiaqi Tong, Brennan Kahan, Michael O. Harhay, and Fan Li (Statistica Sinica, in press). It provides point estimates, standard errors, and confidence intervals for both the conditionally doubly robust (CDR) and debiased machine learning (DML) estimators.
You can install the development version of PSor from GitHub with:
# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("deckardt98/PSor")This example demonstrates how to use PSor.fit to estimate principal causal effects with simulated data from our manuscript. The data include a binary treatment Z, a binary intermediate outcome D, a continuous final outcome Y, and baseline covariates,
For example, in a noncompliance setting where
First, we load the necessary packages and define a function to generate a simulated dataset with a binary treatment Z, a binary intermediate outcome D, a continuous final outcome Y, and four covariates, X1 through X4.
library(truncnorm)
expit <- function(x){return(exp(x)/(1+exp(x)))}
simu_full_data <- function(n, seed=20250917, theta){
# Input:
# n: sample size
# theta: odds ratio sensitivity parameter; theta = 1 assumes independence and theta = Inf assumes monotonicity
set.seed(seed)
Z <- D <- c()
# Simulate covariates
X1 <- rtruncnorm(n, a=-20, b=20, mean = 0, sd = 1)
X2 <- rtruncnorm(n, a=-20, b=20, mean = 0, sd = 1)
X3 <- rtruncnorm(n, a=-20, b=20, mean = 0, sd = 1)
X4 <- rbinom(n, size = 1, prob = 0.5)
if (theta==Inf){
X1 <- abs(X1)
X2 <- abs(X2)
X3 <- abs(X3)
probZ <- expit(0.1*(X1+X2+X3)+0.5*X4)
Z <- rbinom(n, size = 1, prob = probZ)
# Simulate G=(D(0),D(1))
probD1 <- expit(1.2*X4)
probD0 <- expit(-0.4-0.2*X1-0.2*X2-0.2*X3-0.2*X4)
prob11 <- probD0
prob01 <- probD1 - probD0
prob00 <- 1 - probD1
prob_matrix <- cbind(prob00, prob01, prob11)
# Simulate G from the categorical distribution
G <- apply(prob_matrix, 1, function(p) sample(0:2, size = 1, prob = p))
# Simulate D(1)
D1 <- as.numeric(I(G!=0))
# Simulate D(0)
D0 <- as.numeric(I(G==2))
# Compute observed intermediate outcome
D <- D1*Z+(1-Z)*D0
} else if (theta==1) {
probZ <- expit(0.1*(X1+X2+X3)+0.5*X4)
Z <- rbinom(n, size = 1, prob = probZ)
# Simulate (D(0),D(1))
probD1 <- expit(0.3*X1+0.4*X2+0.3*X3+0.5*X4)
probD0 <- expit(0.4*X1+0.3*X2+0.4*X3+0.5*X4)
prob11 <- probD0*probD1
prob10 <- probD0 - prob11
prob01 <- probD1 - prob11
prob00 <- 1-prob11-prob10-prob01
prob_matrix <- cbind(prob10, prob00, prob01, prob11)
jointD <- apply(prob_matrix, 1, function(p) sample(1:4, size = 1, prob = p))
# Simulate D(0)
D0 <- as.numeric(I(jointD==1|jointD==4))
# Simulate D(1)
D1 <- as.numeric(I(jointD==3|jointD==4))
# Compute observed intermediate outcome
D <- D1*Z+(1-Z)*D0
} else {
probZ <- expit(0.1*(X1+X2+X3)+0.5*X4)
Z <- rbinom(n, size = 1, prob = probZ)
# Simulate (D(0),D(1))
probD1 <- expit(0.3*X1+0.4*X2+0.3*X3+0.5*X4)
probD0 <- expit(0.4*X1+0.3*X2+0.4*X3+0.5*X4)
deltaX <- (1+(theta-1)*(probD1+probD0))^2-4*theta*(theta-1)*probD1*probD0
prob11 <- (1+(theta-1)*(probD1+probD0)-sqrt(deltaX))/2/(theta-1)
prob10 <- probD0 - prob11
prob01 <- probD1 - prob11
prob00 <- 1-prob11-prob10-prob01
prob_matrix <- cbind(prob10, prob00, prob01, prob11)
jointD <- apply(prob_matrix, 1, function(p) sample(1:4, size = 1, prob = p))
# Simulate D(0)
D0 <- as.numeric(I(jointD==1|jointD==4))
# Simulate D(1)
D1 <- as.numeric(I(jointD==3|jointD==4))
# Compute observed intermediate outcome
D <- D1*Z+(1-Z)*D0
}
# Simulate potential final outcome
meanY1 <- -1+D1+X1+3*X2+3*X3+3*X4
meanY0 <- 3-D0-1.5*X1+2*X2+2*X3-2*X4
Y1 <- rnorm(n = n, mean = meanY1, sd = 1)
Y0 <- rnorm(n = n, mean = meanY0, sd = 1)
Y <- Y1*Z+(1-Z)*Y0
return(as.data.frame(cbind(X1,X2,X3,X4,Z,D,Y)))
}We simulate a dataset under counterfactual intermediate independence, with PSor.fit to estimate principal causal effects under the correctly specified odds ratio and under incorrectly assumed monotonicity.
library(PSor)
library(SuperLearner)
#> Loading required package: nnls
#> Loading required package: gam
#> Loading required package: splines
#> Loading required package: foreach
#> Loaded gam 1.22-6
#> Super Learner
#> Version: 2.0-29
#> Package created on 2024-02-06
# Generate a data set under independence; or = 1
n = 500
theta = 1
df <- simu_full_data(n, theta=theta)
# Fit correctly specified odds ratio, or = 1
PSor.fit(
out.formula = Y~X1+X2+X3+X4,
ps.formula = D~X1+X2+X3+X4,
pro.formula = Z~X1+X2+X3+X4,
df = df,
out.name = "Y",
int.name = "D",
trt.name = "Z",
cov.names = c("X1","X2","X3","X4"),
or = 1,
SLmethods = c("SL.glm", "SL.rpart", "SL.nnet"),
n.fold = 5,
scale = "RD",
alpha = 0.05
)
#> CDR.Est CDR.SE CDR.ci.low CDR.ci.up DML.Est DML.SE DML.ci.low
#> Always-Takers 2.193 0.330 1.545 2.840 2.146 0.359 1.441
#> Compliers -0.198 0.444 -1.067 0.672 -0.239 0.461 -1.142
#> Never-Takers -3.278 0.397 -4.056 -2.500 -3.235 0.405 -4.029
#> Defiers -0.226 0.399 -1.009 0.556 -0.272 0.402 -1.060
#> DML.ci.up
#> Always-Takers 2.850
#> Compliers 0.664
#> Never-Takers -2.442
#> Defiers 0.516
# Fit by incorrectly assuming monotonicity
PSor.fit(
out.formula = Y~X1+X2+X3+X4,
ps.formula = D~X1+X2+X3+X4,
pro.formula = Z~X1+X2+X3+X4,
df = df,
out.name = "Y",
int.name = "D",
trt.name = "Z",
cov.names = c("X1","X2","X3","X4"),
or = Inf,
SLmethods = c("SL.glm", "SL.rpart", "SL.nnet"),
n.fold = 5,
scale = "RD",
alpha = 0.05
)
#> CDR.Est CDR.SE CDR.ci.lower CDR.ci.upper DML.Est DML.SE
#> Always-Takers (11) 1.438 0.310 0.831 2.045 1.433 0.317
#> Compliers (01) -35.204 522.863 -1059.997 989.589 46.878 21.272
#> Never-Takers (00) -2.305 0.298 -2.889 -1.722 -2.278 0.315
#> DML.ci.lower DML.ci.upper
#> Always-Takers (11) 0.812 2.055
#> Compliers (01) 5.185 88.571
#> Never-Takers (00) -2.896 -1.660Setting or = Inf computes estimates under monotonicity. The CDR estimator uses linear regression for the continuous outcome and logistic regression for the intermediate outcome and treatment propensity. The DML estimator uses the SuperLearner package to estimate nuisance functions, including the outcome regression, principal score, and propensity score. The argument SLmethods = c("SL.glm", "SL.rpart", "SL.nnet") specifies the machine learning algorithms used to estimate these functions.