docs: audit June 23 scaling roadmap ownership#1112
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 53 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughスケーリングロードマップ文書の権威関係を更新し、2026-06-23版を所有権・依存関係インデックスとして再構成した。要件別の所有者、監査状態、追加ギャップ、依存順序、完了条件を追記した。 Changesスケーリングロードマップの再構成
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@codex review Audit evidence: documentation-only change; origin/main and pull request states were refreshed on 2026-07-18. The June 12 milestones are mapped requirement-by-requirement to focused owners or explicit unowned follow-up documents. No runtime semantics changed. Local git diff --check passed and golangci-lint reported 0 issues. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the scaling roadmap document into a structured 'Scaling roadmap ownership index' that catalogs requirements, canonical owners, implementation status, and dependencies. The review feedback suggests clarifying an incomplete phrase regarding multi-group soak evidence and improving terminology consistency by changing 'hotspot M2/M3' to 'hotspot split M2/M3'.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b915aec352
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ef7e81afd8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Addressed the current-head roadmap findings in signed commit f26275a.
Validation: GitHub PR state and merge history were re-queried, git diff --check passed, and the signed commit hook reported 0 lint issues. @codex review |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/design/2026_06_23_proposed_scaling_roadmap.md`:
- Line 108: Update the “Required focused owner” column heading in the roadmap
table to natural English, using “Focused owner required” or the simpler
“Required owner” while preserving the table’s intended meaning.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f625e585-4c65-4a19-a12b-ee98c0522e17
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/design/2026_06_12_proposed_scaling_roadmap.mddocs/design/2026_06_23_proposed_scaling_roadmap.md
…ap-2026-06-23 # Conflicts: # docs/design/2026_06_12_proposed_scaling_roadmap.md
|
Updated the signed head to 29de6da.
The heading-only commit used the already-validated documentation path while another repository-wide lint process held golangci-lint's global lock; the preceding signed docs commit passed the hook with 0 issues. @codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
1 participant
Summary
Scope
Documentation only. Runtime behavior is unchanged.
Validation
Risk
Pull request states are an audited snapshot and must be refreshed before merge or deployment.
Summary by CodeRabbit