Repository navigation
Record that reviewer denials carry no rationale - #938
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Under Codex
review: auto_review, a command the native reviewer denies completes as afailedItem, with no reason. Codex 0.153.4 does send the reviewer'srationalein itsitem/autoApprovalReview/*notifications. Its source marks that shape as expected to change, and the pinned Items have no field that could carry it. Mapping it into an Item would invent official semantics, so Core keeps the Item as it is, and the compatibility ledger now says so (en/zh).Verification
check-translationspasses.Open in [code]smith · Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need.