Skip to content

Reconcile authorization action and resource catalogue#117

Merged
abiorh-claw merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
codex/ws-auth-001-action-catalogue-reconciliation
Jul 14, 2026
Merged

Reconcile authorization action and resource catalogue#117
abiorh-claw merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
codex/ws-auth-001-action-catalogue-reconciliation

Conversation

@Abiorh001

@Abiorh001 Abiorh001 commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PR Trust Bundle: WS-AUTH-001-CAT

Chunk

WS-AUTH-001-CAT - Action And Resource Catalogue Reconciliation

Goal And Human-Approved Intent

Review the proposed catalogue against the live repository, copy only validated
rules into canonical docs and owning future chunks, reject incompatible content,
then resume AUTH-05B after this docs-only amendment merges.

What Changed And Why

  • Added a staged typed ActionId/PermissionId model to the canonical AUTH spec.
  • Updated AUTH-07 through AUTH-16 contracts with exact ownership, conformance,
    evidence, coverage, and audit-parity requirements.
  • Preserved 52 approved permission identifiers while recording the current
    49-identifier persisted audit base and planned recovery transition.
  • Reconciled future AUTH migration custody through 0026.
  • Recorded D15 and current loop state.
  • Removed the rejected root proposal instead of committing a competing authority.

The change is needed because the input contained sound authorization mechanics
but contradicted merged API, audit, model, and cross-domain contracts.

Design Chosen

Routes and commands declare exact stable ActionId values. Each active action
maps to one approved PermissionId, canonical target, typed resource facts, and
guard set. Multiple actions may map to one retained broad permission. Planned
metadata is non-executable and cannot predesign resources owned by WS-REV,
WS-CON, or artifact storage. Feature services remain canonical resource owners.

Alternatives Rejected

  • Treating the input as a normative addendum.
  • Replacing broad permission identifiers without audit/schema migration.
  • Adding /v1 or a compatibility route tree.
  • Centralizing feature queries inside AUTH.
  • Inventing artifact outbox/recovery or future review/compensation aggregates.
  • Deferring missing route declarations or coverage regressions until AUTH-16.
  • Recording only broad permission when exact action identity affects guards.

Scope And Product Behavior

The patch changes Markdown only. It does not activate authorization, change an
API, alter a permission, migrate data, modify product lifecycle behavior, or
start AUTH-05B. Current runtime behavior remains unchanged.

Acceptance Proof And Checks

All chunk acceptance criteria are reflected in the canonical spec, D15, and
owning future chunk contracts. Stale wording, authorization-doc, artifact
contract, Markdown-link, and diff-integrity checks pass.

No tests were added, changed, removed, skipped, or weakened. No CI, dependency,
coverage threshold, or configuration changed.

Reviewer Results

Senior engineering, architecture, docs, QA/test, security/auth/privacy, and
product/ops passed after all valid findings were repaired. Full details are in
WS-AUTH-001-CAT-internal-review-evidence.md.

External Review

Pending GitHub checks, CodeRabbit, and human review.

Remaining Risks And Follow-Up

The catalogue is a future implementation contract, not runtime proof. AUTH-05B
remains the next runtime chunk and is unaffected by this action catalogue.
AUTH-07 must implement the registry/evidence design; route-owning chunks must
prove activation incrementally; later domain initiatives require their own
approved resources and permission migrations.

Human Review Focus

Confirm the 52-approved/49-persisted distinction, ActionId evidence, domain
ownership, planned/active boundary, per-chunk 90 percent coverage, and migration
sequence. Confirm that no rejected catalogue content entered canonical docs.

Human Merge Ownership

Only the user may explicitly approve and merge this PR. AUTH-05B begins only
after this amendment merges and loop memory is current.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified the authorization model with typed action and resource registration, canonical targets, and fail-closed validation.
    • Documented stable action identifiers in authorization decisions, audit evidence, logs, and metrics.
    • Expanded conformance requirements for protected API routes and asynchronous commands.
    • Preserved the existing /api/v1 namespace and approved permission identifiers.
    • Added reconciliation, review, sequencing, and verification guidance for upcoming authorization work.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@Abiorh001, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 39 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 797447b5-912a-4c31-8227-012f6c39c2aa

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f8a423 and 5b4ec96.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .agent-loop/REVIEW_LOG.md
  • .agent-loop/WORK_QUEUE.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-CAT-external-review-response.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-CAT-internal-review-evidence.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-CAT-pr-trust-bundle.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This docs-only change introduces the WS-AUTH-001-CAT reconciliation chunk, updates authorization registry and resource rules, revises downstream chunk contracts and verification requirements, and records lifecycle state plus internal review evidence. No runtime, migration, CI, or dependency implementation changes are introduced.

Changes

WS-AUTH-001 Catalogue Reconciliation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Workstream state and sequencing
.agent-loop/LOOP_STATE.md, .agent-loop/REVIEW_LOG.md, .agent-loop/WORK_QUEUE.md, .agent-loop/initiatives/.../CHUNK_MAP.md, .agent-loop/initiatives/.../STATUS.md
WS-AUTH-001-CAT is added as the active docs phase between AUTH-05A and AUTH-05B, while AUTH-05B remains inactive pending CAT merge and post-merge memory.
Typed authorization contract
.agent-loop/initiatives/.../DECISIONS.md, docs/spec_authorization_service.md
D15 and the authorization specification define typed ActionId registration, canonical resource facts, fail-closed guards, evidence propagation, and manifest conformance requirements.
Catalogue reconciliation contract
.agent-loop/initiatives/.../chunks/WS-AUTH-001-CAT-action-resource-catalogue-reconciliation.md
The new CAT contract restricts work to documentation reconciliation, preserves approved identifiers and /api/v1, and defines registry, ownership, verification, and stop-condition rules.
Downstream chunk acceptance updates
.agent-loop/initiatives/.../chunks/WS-AUTH-001-0{6..9}-*.md, .agent-loop/initiatives/.../chunks/WS-AUTH-001-1{0..6}-*.md
AUTH-06 through AUTH-16 contracts add primary ActionId declarations, canonical-target requirements, manifest checks, migration references, targeted tests, and 90% authorization coverage gates.
Review and trust evidence
.agent-loop/initiatives/.../reviews/*
Internal review evidence and the trust bundle document rejected catalogue content, repaired findings, reviewer passes, verification commands, and pending external review.

Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: abiorh-claw

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: reconciling the authorization action and resource catalogue.
Description check ✅ Passed The description covers the core template sections well, but it omits some subsections like allowed files, evidence commands, test delta, and CI/gate integrity.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/ws-auth-001-action-catalogue-reconciliation

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In
@.agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/STATUS.md:
- Around line 112-118: Update the scope-decision text near WS-AUTH-001-CAT to
say “49-identifier persisted audit base” and explicitly retain all 52 approved
permission identifiers, including the three recovery identifiers. Preserve the
distinction between the approved catalogue and persisted audit representation
without changing the AUTH-05B sequencing or ownership decision.

In @.agent-loop/WORK_QUEUE.md:
- Around line 10-13: Update the AUTH-05B lifecycle references in WORK_QUEUE.md
to remove the contradictory second explicit-start requirement in the later queue
instructions. Preserve the existing “Start signal received” status and ensure
the queue treats AUTH-05B as ready to proceed after CAT merges without another
start signal.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2d6b5704-ef04-4d0f-a0ce-cd5f79a1ea78

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab49b73 and 2f8a423.

📒 Files selected for processing (21)
  • .agent-loop/LOOP_STATE.md
  • .agent-loop/REVIEW_LOG.md
  • .agent-loop/WORK_QUEUE.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/CHUNK_MAP.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/DECISIONS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/STATUS.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-06-canonical-actor-profile.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-07-authorization-kernel.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-08-bootstrap-admin-grants.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-09-actor-state-service-actors.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-10-project-role-grants.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-11-project-read-cutover.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-12-project-mutation-cutover.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-13-task-assignment-cutover.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-14-submission-checker-cutover.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-15-worker-authority-removal.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-16-evidence-live-proof.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/chunks/WS-AUTH-001-CAT-action-resource-catalogue-reconciliation.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-CAT-internal-review-evidence.md
  • .agent-loop/initiatives/WS-AUTH-001-workstream-authorization-service/reviews/WS-AUTH-001-CAT-pr-trust-bundle.md
  • docs/spec_authorization_service.md

Comment thread .agent-loop/WORK_QUEUE.md
@abiorh-claw abiorh-claw self-requested a review July 14, 2026 15:19
@abiorh-claw abiorh-claw merged commit 4c5d4fc into main Jul 14, 2026
3 checks passed
@abiorh-claw abiorh-claw deleted the codex/ws-auth-001-action-catalogue-reconciliation branch July 14, 2026 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants