docs: correct contributor licence to AGPL-3.0 in CONTRIBUTING.md - #990
webadderall merged 1 commit into
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe contribution license statement in ChangesContribution License Update
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The contribution guidance now points to the correct AGPL-3.0 license document, with no material merge risk identified. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
CONTRIBUTING.md stated that contributions are licensed under the MIT License and linked to ./LICENSE, but the project ships LICENSE.md containing the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0, and both the README and recordly.dev state AGPL-3.0. Point the section at the licence the project actually uses and fix the link target, which was broken (LICENSE vs LICENSE.md).
458b0ea to
4fd4813
Compare
The License section of
CONTRIBUTING.mdsays contributions are licensed under the MIT License and links to./LICENSE. Two problems:LICENSE.mdcontaining the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0. The README and recordly.dev both state AGPL-3.0, so MIT appears to be a leftover from a template../LICENSEdoes not exist, so it 404s on GitHub.This matters beyond typo level: contributors are agreeing to a licence in this document that does not match the one the project actually ships, which leaves the terms of past contributions ambiguous.
This PR points the section at AGPL-3.0 and fixes the link to
./LICENSE.md. Docs only, no code change.Happy to adjust the wording if MIT was the intent and
LICENSE.mdis the file that is wrong.