`RowFn` binary numeric `ScalarFn` rewrite by connortsui20 · Pull Request #9320 · vortex-data/vortex

Performance Regression: -16.05%

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 60 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1899 untouched benchmarks
🆕 1 new benchmark
⏩ 85 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`case_when_nary_10_conditions[1000]`	421.3 µs	606.1 µs	-30.49%
❌	Simulation	`compact_sliced[(16384, 10)]`	1.4 ms	1.9 ms	-26.52%
❌	Simulation	`compact_sliced[(4096, 10)]`	385.6 µs	515.5 µs	-25.19%
❌	Simulation	`baseline_lt[4, 1024]`	98 µs	129.6 µs	-24.39%
❌	Simulation	`case_when_nary_equality_lookup[1000]`	323.9 µs	421.3 µs	-23.13%
❌	Simulation	`case_when_nary_10_conditions[10000]`	765.8 µs	991 µs	-22.72%
❌	Simulation	`multipolygon_random_nulls`	951.3 µs	1,223.1 µs	-22.22%
❌	Simulation	`eq_i64_constant`	372.8 µs	478.6 µs	-22.12%
❌	Simulation	`baseline_eq[4, 1024]`	97.4 µs	125 µs	-22.06%
❌	Simulation	`baseline_lt[16, 1024]`	99.4 µs	127.1 µs	-21.81%
❌	Simulation	`baseline_eq[16, 1024]`	99.2 µs	126.4 µs	-21.56%
❌	Simulation	`case_when_nary_3_conditions[1000]`	236.6 µs	299.1 µs	-20.92%
❌	Simulation	`case_when_nary_early_dominant[1000]`	235 µs	294.5 µs	-20.23%
❌	Simulation	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(1000, 10000)]`	130.1 µs	160.4 µs	-18.92%
❌	Simulation	`case_when_nary_equality_lookup[10000]`	527.7 µs	649 µs	-18.69%
❌	Simulation	`case_when_all_false[1000]`	123.8 µs	151.8 µs	-18.45%
❌	Simulation	`multipolygon_non_nullable`	1.2 ms	1.5 ms	-18.26%
❌	Simulation	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(2000, 10000)]`	143.8 µs	175.4 µs	-18.02%
❌	Simulation	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(2500, 10000)]`	151 µs	184.1 µs	-17.99%
❌	Simulation	`multipolygon_mixed_validity`	1.2 ms	1.5 ms	-17.99%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing ct/row-fn-numeric (32ad0bf) with ct/row-fn-api (84837ad)}

85 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩