Skip to content

Plan V2 random access by the segments a selection reads - #10621

Closed
joseph-isaacs wants to merge 15 commits into
developfrom
ji/charming-cerf-9hlmns
Closed

joseph-isaacs wants to merge 15 commits into
developfrom
ji/charming-cerf-9hlmns

Don't link the private file planner from into_stream's docs

2d5cd2b
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Oct 20, 2026

1 benchmark regressed

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ 20 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls

System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.

Measurement and system calls

ℹ️ 40 benchmarks have no flame graph

The flamegraph could not be generated because we failed to resolve the symbols in the profiling trace. This happens when we fail to harvest information about language frames.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 2404 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 12 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ Simulation take[routing/grouped_chunks/primitive/nonnull/chunks=32/indices=1000] 385 µs 429.5 µs -10.36%
⚡ Simulation chunked_opt_bool_canonical_into[(1000, 10)] 65.4 µs 55.1 µs +18.6%
⚡ WallTime starts_with_avx2[64, VarBin] 60.3 µs 53.3 µs +13.03%
⚡ WallTime words_gather_dispatch_neon[65536] 2 µs 1.8 µs +10.04%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ji/charming-cerf-9hlmns (2d5cd2b) with develop (9be4ef1)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 12 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩