Skip to content

bench(fastlanes): add baseline for BitPacked range take - #10554

Merged
blaginin merged 1 commit into
developfrom
db/bitpacked-take-benchmarks
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

blaginin merged 1 commit into
developfrom
db/bitpacked-take-benchmarks

Conversation

@blaginin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Prepared with Codex.

Signed-off-by: blaginin <github@blaginin.me>
@blaginin
blaginin added this pull request to stack #10556 October 16, 2026 14:05
@blaginin
blaginin marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2026 14:07
@blaginin blaginin added the changelog/skip Do not list PR in the changelog label Oct 16, 2026
@codspeed

codspeed Bot commented Oct 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will regress 3 benchmarks

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ 2 benchmarks measured no execution time

Nothing ran under measurement, usually because the compiler removed the code under test. These results are not comparable, so they count as unchanged.

Preventing compiler optimizations

⚠️ 20 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls

System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.

Measurement and system calls

ℹ️ 40 benchmarks have no flame graph

The flamegraph could not be generated because we failed to resolve the symbols in the profiling trace. This happens when we fail to harvest information about language frames.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2240 untouched benchmarks
🆕 76 new benchmarks
⏩ 12 skipped benchmarks1

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ ⚠️ Simulation density_sweep_dense_runs[0.001] 29 µs 46.7 µs -38.02%
❌ ⚠️ Simulation test_repeated_scan_scalar_at[int_str] 444.4 µs 541.6 µs -17.95%
❌ ⚠️ Simulation test_scan_scalar_at[int] 802.4 µs 908.7 µs -11.7%
⚡ Simulation take_map[(0.1, 1.0)] 352.2 µs 221.2 µs +59.22%
⚡ Simulation take_map[(0.1, 0.5)] 182.6 µs 146.4 µs +24.72%
⚡ Simulation patched_take_10_stratified 71.8 µs 57.8 µs +24.23%
⚡ Simulation take_map[(0.1, 0.05)] 87 µs 77.4 µs +12.42%
🆕 Simulation embedding_code_runs_expanded_baseline[1024] N/A 535.9 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_code_runs_expanded_baseline[2048] N/A 997.9 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_code_runs_expanded_baseline[4096] N/A 1.9 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_code_runs_expanded_baseline[512] N/A 306.4 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_code_runs[1024] N/A 534.9 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_code_runs[2048] N/A 997 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_code_runs[4096] N/A 1.9 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_code_runs[512] N/A 305.9 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_runs_expanded_baseline[1024] N/A 607.3 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_runs_expanded_baseline[1536] N/A 892.5 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_runs_expanded_baseline[768] N/A 499.8 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_runs[1024] N/A 605.3 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation embedding_runs[1536] N/A 890.8 µs N/A
... ... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing db/bitpacked-take-benchmarks (c799ef9) with develop (6eae823)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 12 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

@blaginin
blaginin merged commit d9eed65 into develop Oct 16, 2026
118 of 120 checks passed
@blaginin
blaginin deleted the db/bitpacked-take-benchmarks branch October 16, 2026 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/skip Do not list PR in the changelog

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants