Repository navigation
feat: switch vortex compress to use v2 scan api - #10540
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ 16 benchmarks spent significant time in system calls
System calls cannot be consistently instrumented, so they are not included in the measure, which understates the real cost. Please switch to the Walltime instrument to accurately measure system calls.
⚡ 29 improved benchmarks
✅ 2358 untouched benchmarks
🆕 9 new benchmarks
⏩ 12 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | WallTime | threshold_neon[8] |
2.4 µs | 1.3 µs | +80.41% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | threshold_neon[80] |
4.9 µs | 3.3 µs | +47.36% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | filter_neon[8] |
1,339 ns | 918 ns | +45.86% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | threshold_neon[64] |
3.5 µs | 2.5 µs | +40.64% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | filter_neon[64] |
2.3 µs | 1.8 µs | +30% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | isolated_runs[u64, (161, 944)] |
168.2 µs | 137.7 µs | +22.12% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | embedding_code_runs_expanded_baseline[4096] |
1.9 ms | 1.6 ms | +20.65% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | embedding_code_runs_expanded_baseline[2048] |
1,016.3 µs | 850.6 µs | +19.48% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | embedding_code_runs_expanded_baseline[1024] |
548.4 µs | 465.1 µs | +17.89% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | isolated_runs[u64, (256, 896)] |
219.7 µs | 189.2 µs | +16.11% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | embedding_runs_expanded_baseline[1024] |
609 µs | 525.7 µs | +15.84% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | embedding_runs_expanded_baseline[1536] |
913.6 µs | 789.1 µs | +15.77% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | fragmented_runs_expanded_baseline[1024] |
623.2 µs | 540.2 µs | +15.37% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | embedding_code_runs_expanded_baseline[512] |
319.9 µs | 278.9 µs | +14.72% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | isolated_runs[u64, (161, 0)] |
180.4 µs | 157.2 µs | +14.72% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | isolated_runs[u64, (256, 0)] |
192.8 µs | 169.3 µs | +13.86% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | embedding_runs_expanded_baseline[768] |
516.1 µs | 454.6 µs | +13.51% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | isolated_runs[u64, (256, 1020)] |
196.6 µs | 173.5 µs | +13.34% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | isolated_runs[u32, (128, 0)] |
111.6 µs | 98.6 µs | +13.17% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | isolated_runs[u32, (160, 0)] |
113.8 µs | 101 µs | +12.67% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ji/upbeat-volta-adp0xd (a9e2601) with develop (6289e58)2
Footnotes
-
12 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
develop(bc9e0e6) during the generation of this report, so 6289e58 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩