Manual: improve documentation on checksum - #61715
Open
gschwaer wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
Quotes are only used when specifying multiple checksums.
xbps-src uses xbps-digest internally. While sha256sum should arrive at the same result using sha256sum in the manual suggests to the reader that sha256sum is used internally.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a proposal, because I'm not sure if all changes are desired. I committed in small chunks so parts can be dropped easily. I can squash everything if that is preferred.
I tried to find how to generate a checksum and couldn't find it. It says "sha256", but I find a command builds more confidence for newbies. I first selected the wrong command when skimming the docs and used
tar xf <tarball.ext> --to-stdout | sha256sum.Also I changed
sha256sumtoxbps-digest, which is whatxbps-srcuses internally.Thanks