Conversation
…ison query 9cc7db18) Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/vertical-cloud-lab/tensegrity-optimization/sessions/14fe05f5-d334-4c79-bb80-127b60ace689 Co-authored-by: sgbaird <45469701+sgbaird@users.noreply.github.com>
…table delimiters Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/vertical-cloud-lab/tensegrity-optimization/sessions/14fe05f5-d334-4c79-bb80-127b60ace689 Co-authored-by: sgbaird <45469701+sgbaird@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot for any edison queries that were vague, use your API key to get the actual artifacts (JSON I think) that have more details about the publications and authors I think. Fetch any unfetched queries from this pull request. The BO folks from "Authors appearing ≥2× across" are largely out of scope. It needs to be grounded in people who actually publish in the journals mentioned and similar journals. |
…thors (drop BoTorch/Ax tooling pool) Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/vertical-cloud-lab/tensegrity-optimization/sessions/7b232848-20ca-4856-9059-a642f8db0689 Co-authored-by: sgbaird-alt <71569943+sgbaird-alt@users.noreply.github.com>
Done in 798693c.
|
…jectories Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/vertical-cloud-lab/tensegrity-optimization/sessions/deb9992b-47de-4c3b-8019-63ef76c412e2 Co-authored-by: sgbaird-alt <71569943+sgbaird-alt@users.noreply.github.com>
Added as new §3d′ "Lander"-style designs / drag-free impact survival in Top 3 to actually reach out to first:
Next tier (4–10): Vytas SunSpiral (NIAC SUPERball PI, formerly NASA Ames; now Stoke Space / RGo Robotics), Andrew Zhang + Brian Cera (UC Berkeley, Agogino lineage — best instrumented public dataset, 10–20 m drops, 235 g peak), Massimo Vespignani (SUPERball v2 design, 2018), Skelton / Sultan (TAMU / VT — class-1 lander theory), Jamshid Bayandor (Virginia Tech CRASH Lab — scaled-up TANDEM lander 2017), Jing Zhang et al. (HIT — Aerospace 2025 class-II spherical tensegrity), Madhumati Anand (biodegradable tensegrity, 75 m drops onto pavement, 2022). Note: this cluster has essentially zero overlap with the crutch-tip / assistive-device pool — only Rimoli + Pajunen are shared with the JMD/SMS pools — so if the egg-drop demo is folded into the manuscript, expect the AE to recruit a space-systems / aerospace-mechanisms reviewer from §3d′ in addition to the §3b panel. |
Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/vertical-cloud-lab/tensegrity-optimization/sessions/deb9992b-47de-4c3b-8019-63ef76c412e2 Co-authored-by: sgbaird-alt <71569943+sgbaird-alt@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@copilot send an edison query - what aspects would be best to seek feedback/help about? Consider all PRs in this repo. For example, tech transfer, what some of the real-world challenges are, any immediate "gotchas" that come to mind. Draft just a couple sentences each. I'll probably throw those sentences away and rewrite, but might as well. Is there also some way they could contribute collaboratively that comes to mind? For example, external validation. |
…treach-topics query (task f18aca01) Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/vertical-cloud-lab/tensegrity-optimization/sessions/3d6aa12e-ad0b-4b49-9092-fc63f9ef2682 Co-authored-by: sgbaird-alt <71569943+sgbaird-alt@users.noreply.github.com>
…ers + per-contact routing + stretch ideas) Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/vertical-cloud-lab/tensegrity-optimization/sessions/3d6aa12e-ad0b-4b49-9092-fc63f9ef2682 Co-authored-by: sgbaird-alt <71569943+sgbaird-alt@users.noreply.github.com>
…es asks to 12 named contacts) Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/vertical-cloud-lab/tensegrity-optimization/sessions/3d6aa12e-ad0b-4b49-9092-fc63f9ef2682 Co-authored-by: sgbaird-alt <71569943+sgbaird-alt@users.noreply.github.com>
Done in 56f58de. Submitted + fetched Edison Also drafted throwaway 1–2-sentence pitches in new §3d″ "First-contact talking points" in
Edison also returned an 8-item stretch section of mechanisms I hadn't drafted: digital-twin round-robin (NIST AM-Bench style); materials-genome integration of PETG–TPU bond data; citizen-science egg-drop campaign with downloadable STL/3MF kit; prestress-monitoring IoT (smart tensegrity); topology-optimization collab with Panozzo's PolyFEM team; ASTM F42/D20 standards pathway for multi-material FFF interface bond; FTO patent landscape scan for the joint geometries; high-speed-video + accelerometer sharing consortium. Per-contact ask routing in Edison's §(e) table covers all 12 named lander-pool contacts, each anchored to one of their own peer-reviewed papers (e.g. Rimoli → Garanger et al. 2021 Soft tensegrity systems for planetary landing; Mueller → Zha et al. 2024 IEEE/ASME T-Mech; Skelton → Williamson & Skelton 2003 General class of tensegrity structures; Jing Zhang → Zhang et al. 2025 Aerospace; Anand → Anand et al. 2022 arXiv 2212.11625) — use those citations directly in the email body. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a reviewer/AE targeting memo and outreach talking points for the JMD manuscript thread (PR #20) and the egg-drop/lander outreach thread (PR #47), grounded in committed Edison LITERATURE_HIGH artifacts and a reproducible Edison submission script.
Changes:
- Add
reviews/target_audience.mdwith JMD reviewer-profile diversity expectations, a named candidate reviewer pool, a COI screen, a lander-style outreach contact list, and draft first-contact talking points. - Commit Edison trajectory artifacts (
.md+.json) for the target-audience and outreach-topicsLITERATURE_HIGHruns. - Add
scripts/edison/submit_outreach_topics.pyto reproduce the outreach-topics Edison task and persist results.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 5 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| scripts/edison/submit_outreach_topics.py | Submits and fetches an Edison LITERATURE_HIGH outreach-topics query; writes submitted task_id + md/json artifacts. |
| reviews/target_audience.md | JMD/SMS audience analysis, candidate reviewer pool, outreach contact shortlist, and draft talking points. |
| edison-trajectories/2026-05-09-target-audience-9cc7db18.md | Verbatim Edison formatted answer for the JMD reviewer/AE profiling query. |
| edison-trajectories/2026-05-09-target-audience-9cc7db18.json | Structured Edison task payload for the target-audience query. |
| edison-trajectories/2026-05-12-outreach-topics-f18aca01-00bb-4ca7-a8e9-f6312dfaaff7.md | Verbatim Edison formatted answer for outreach talking points / ask-routing. |
| edison-trajectories/2026-05-12-outreach-topics-f18aca01-00bb-4ca7-a8e9-f6312dfaaff7.json | Structured Edison task payload for the outreach-topics query. |
| - **Manufacturing:** PETG struts + TPU 95A tendons on a Bambu Lab H2D IDEX | ||
| printer (per the lab's hardware standard -- see the repo's hardware memory). |
| > | ||
| > **Primary venue:** ASME Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD). | ||
| > **Backup venue:** Smart Materials and Structures (SMS, IOP). | ||
| > See `manuscript/README.md` (PR #20) for the venue selection rationale. |
| - `edison-trajectories/2026-05-08-sim-survey-782657e0.md` | ||
| (branch `copilot/explore-simulations-for-tensegrity`). |
| # Persist the task id immediately so we can fetch later if needed. | ||
| submitted_path = OUT_DIR / "outreach-topics-SUBMITTED.json" | ||
| submitted_path.write_text( | ||
| json.dumps({"task_id": task_id, "name": "LITERATURE_HIGH"}, indent=2) | ||
| + "\n" | ||
| ) | ||
| print(f"wrote {submitted_path}") |
| # Try to wait in-session. | ||
| print("Waiting for task to complete (this may take several minutes) ...") | ||
| results = client.get_task(task_id, verbose=True) | ||
| if not isinstance(results, list): | ||
| results = [results] | ||
| t = results[0] | ||
| print(f"status = {t.status}") | ||
|
|
||
| md_path = OUT_DIR / f"2026-05-12-outreach-topics-{task_id}.md" | ||
| json_path = OUT_DIR / f"2026-05-12-outreach-topics-{task_id}.json" | ||
| md_path.write_text(getattr(t, "formatted_answer", "") or "") | ||
| json_path.write_text( | ||
| json.dumps(json.loads(t.model_dump_json()), indent=2) + "\n" | ||
| ) | ||
| print(f"wrote {md_path}") | ||
| print(f"wrote {json_path}") | ||
| return 0 |
|
@me-madsen @achris0520 @ctrhjk could one of you work on reaching out to the contacts from the following sections? Noting there's some overlap, so making sure we don't email the same person twice. Here's an example of previously when we've been reaching out for another project, modified to match this project more closely: We can use this for the picture: 
Also for the video (a trimmed version of Signal1 from #71 (comment)): tensegrity-drop.mp4 |
I'm on it 🫡 |
|
Thank you! Please make sure to cc me on the emails |
|
@me-madsen thinking about it some more. up to you whether you cc just me or not. Whatever you think is best. When you send the first few emails, could you post back here mentioning who you reached out to? |
I didn't see this until after I sent the first 3, but I will likely adjust my cc list for future emails. For documentation, I just reached out to: Julian J. Rimoli |
|
Additional emails have been sent to the following, with only @sgbaird ccd: |
Identifies likely Associate Editors, reviewer-profile diversity, and named candidate reviewers for the PR #20 manuscript (primary: ASME JMD; backup: SMS), plus a separate cluster of named contacts for "lander"-style / drag-free egg-drop outreach (PR #47), plus drafted first-contact talking points for outreach emails — all grounded in dedicated Edison
LITERATURE_HIGHqueries whose.md+.jsonartifacts are committed alongside this analysis.Changes
edison-trajectories/2026-05-09-target-audience-9cc7db18.{md,json}(new) — verbatimformatted_answer(~40 KB, 25-entry numbered reference list with DOIs and citation counts) plus the structuredmodel_dump_jsonpayload from EdisonLITERATURE_HIGHtask9cc7db18-10b5-457e-9b7c-9a3ecb2b9f14. Per-publication detail (DOIs, citation counts, page-level evidence anchors) is preserved in the JSON for full reproducibility.edison-trajectories/2026-05-12-outreach-topics-f18aca01-00bb-4ca7-a8e9-f6312dfaaff7.{md,json}(new) — verbatimformatted_answer(~50 KB md, 89 KB JSON, status: success) from EdisonLITERATURE_HIGHtaskf18aca01-00bb-4ca7-a8e9-f6312dfaaff7, grounded in cross-PR context (PRs Populate ASME Journal of Mechanical Design manuscript draft from repo context, with todonotes toggle, consolidated bibliography, Edison mock peer review, first-pass blocker fixes, cross-PR planned-methods refresh, a master synthesized bibliography, rea... #20, Document Lansmont M23 drop tower and Polytec QTec laser vibrometer #28, Extensively explore and validate the joint design for PETG + TPU prints to mimic tensegrity #38/Edison-driven survey of funding venues for a larger-scale tensegrity / BO grant #43, Explore egg-drop demo via Edison LITERATURE_HIGH query (+ drag-free baseline / V·m benchmark, Brown-lab BEAR baseline, and SUPERball v2 actuator follow-ups) #47). Returns 7 archetype clusters in (a), tech-transfer angles in (b), 8 gotchas in (c), 8 collaborative mechanisms in (d), per-contact ask routing for all 12 named lander-pool contacts in (e), and an 8-item "stretch" section (digital-twin round-robin, materials-genome integration, citizen-science egg-drop kit, prestress-monitoring IoT, PolyFEM topology-opt collab, ASTM F42/D20 standards pathway, FTO patent landscape scan, high-speed-video + accelerometer sharing consortium).scripts/edison/submit_outreach_topics.py(new) — reproducible submission script for the outreach-topics Edison query, with the full grounded prompt embedded.reviews/target_audience.md(new)reviews/mock_reviews.md.egg-drop-tensegrity-1b90208d.mdandegg-drop-followup-f41b7034.md. Suggested first-contact set of 3: Julian J. Rimoli (Georgia Tech — On the impact tolerance of tensegrity-based planetary landers, AIAA SciTech 2016), Adrian K. Agogino (NASA Ames — NIAC SUPERball Phase 2 final report 2018, the only published egg-payload tensegrity drop with quantitative deceleration data), Mark W. Mueller (UC Berkeley HiPeRLab — Zha et al., IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 2024 collision-resilient icosahedron). Tier-2 (4–10): Vytas SunSpiral, Andrew Zhang + Brian Cera (UC Berkeley, Agogino lineage), Massimo Vespignani (SUPERball v2), Skelton/Sultan, Jamshid Bayandor (Virginia Tech CRASH Lab — TANDEM 2017), Jing Zhang et al. (HIT — Aerospace 2025), Madhumati Anand (biodegradable tensegrity, 75 m drops). Notes that this cluster is essentially disjoint from the crutch-tip / assistive-device pool (only Rimoli + Pajunen are shared with §3b/§3d), so a space-systems / aerospace-mechanisms reviewer should be expected if the egg-drop demo is folded into the manuscript.f18aca01for any actual email body..mdfiles on PR branches plus the consolidatedmanuscript/references.bib(PR Populate ASME Journal of Mechanical Design manuscript draft from repo context, with todonotes toggle, consolidated bibliography, Edison mock peer review, first-pass blocker fixes, cross-PR planned-methods refresh, a master synthesized bibliography, rea... #20). Surfaces that the current corpus is materials/AM-heavy (Polymers, Mater. & Des., Addit. Manuf.) and light on core ASME design-theory venues (one J. Mech. Robotics hit, one SMS hit). Action item: thicken with a targeted JMD/JAM/JMR/S&MO pass before submission.9cc7db18as the primary source for §3a–§3e, the two PR Explore egg-drop demo via Edison LITERATURE_HIGH query (+ drag-free baseline / V·m benchmark, Brown-lab BEAR baseline, and SUPERball v2 actuator follow-ups) #47 egg-drop trajectories (1b90208d+f41b7034) as the source for §3d′, the new outreach-topics trajectoryf18aca01as the source for §3d″, plus all 19 prior trajectory files andreviews/mock_reviews.md.