Skip to content

[world-vercel] Fail the run on a lost event payload instead of retrying forever - #3742

Draft
VaguelySerious wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
peter/v4-terminal-payload-missing
Draft

[world-vercel] Fail the run on a lost event payload instead of retrying forever#3742
VaguelySerious wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
peter/v4-terminal-payload-missing

Conversation

@VaguelySerious

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Problem

A frame stream commits to 200 with its first byte, so a failure partway through the body has no status code left to carry it. The World's only way to signal one was to error the body, which reaches us as a truncated response. That is also exactly what a dropped socket looks like, so the runtime could not tell "retry me" from "this can never work" and kept redelivering.

When the failure is an event payload that no longer exists in storage, every redelivery re-reads the same absent object. One production run re-read a single missing payload 12,932 times in 26 minutes, and the backend event query behind each attempt is what throttled its table.

Change

The World now ends such a stream with a terminal {_error: 1, code, message} frame instead of erroring the body. This PR consumes it:

  • payload-missingCorruptedEventLogError, so the run fails with CORRUPTED_EVENT_LOG. That is accurate: the log references a payload nothing can produce.
  • Any other codeWorkflowWorldError with no retryable code and no status, so it is terminal too. A code this client has never heard of does not become a redelivery loop, and a future one can be handled explicitly later without needing a client release first.

Transient failures are unchanged: the World still errors the body for those, and the runtime still redelivers, which is the right move.

Compatibility

The decoder already rejected any unrecognized _-prefixed control frame, so a client without this change fails loudly on the new frame rather than mistaking a short log for a complete one. It still retries; only a client that knows the code can stop.

Tests

  • payload-missing produces a CorruptedEventLogError naming the ref, and is not a WorkflowWorldError (so not redelivered).
  • An unknown terminal code produces a terminal WorkflowWorldError (no status, non-retryable code).
  • packages/core: isRetryableWorldError(CorruptedEventLogError) is false, next to the existing CORRUPTED_EVENT_LOG mapping assertion.

Full @workflow/world-vercel suite passes (558 tests).

Notes

  • Draft: depends on the World-side change. WORKFLOW_SERVER_URL_OVERRIDE is temporarily pointed at that branch's preview so E2E exercises the new frame; it reverts to '' before merge, and the No Test Overrides / Biome failures on it are expected until then.
  • CORRUPTED_EVENT_LOG docs updated to mention an unreadable stored payload as a cause.

…trying

A frame stream that dies mid-body reaches us as a truncated response, which
is exactly what a dropped socket looks like. So an event whose stored payload
is permanently gone was indistinguishable from a transient blip, and the
runtime kept redelivering a replay that could never succeed: one run re-read
a single missing payload 12,932 times in 26 minutes, and the backend query
behind each attempt throttled its table.

The World now sends a terminal `{_error: 1, code}` frame for failures that a
retry cannot fix. Handle it:

- `payload-missing` raises `CorruptedEventLogError`, so the run fails with
  `CORRUPTED_EVENT_LOG` rather than looping. The log does reference a payload
  nothing can produce.
- An unknown code raises a `WorkflowWorldError` with no retryable code and no
  status, which is also terminal. A future code stays safe without needing a
  client release first.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 3ea2135

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 17 packages
Name Type
@workflow/world-vercel Patch
@workflow/cli Patch
@workflow/core Patch
@workflow/web Patch
workflow Patch
@workflow/world-testing Patch
@workflow/builders Patch
@workflow/next Patch
@workflow/nitro Patch
@workflow/vitest Patch
@workflow/web-shared Patch
@workflow/astro Patch
@workflow/nest Patch
@workflow/rollup Patch
@workflow/sveltekit Patch
@workflow/vite Patch
@workflow/nuxt Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-nestjs-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-python-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-tanstack-start-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workflow-tarballs Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am
workflow-web Ready Ready Preview, v0 Aug 22, 2026 12:34am

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

❌ Failed E2E Tests

▲ Vercel Production (2 failed)

express-quickjs (1 failed):

  • outputStreamWorkflow - getTailIndex and getChunks getTailIndex returns correct index after stream completes

sveltekit-quickjs (1 failed):

  • outputStreamWorkflow - getTailIndex and getChunks getTailIndex returns correct index after stream completes

vercel-http-transport (1 failed)

express (1 failed):

  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success

⚠️ Flaky E2E Tests (passed on retry)

These tests failed at least once and passed on a retry. A recurring entry here is a real race worth investigating.

25 flaky tests
  • abortFetchInFlightWorkflow: aborting cancels an in-flight fetch (tanstack-start)
  • abortHookOrderingWorkflow [hook-first-hook-first]: hook.then → addEventListener → resumeHook → abort() (tanstack-start)
  • abortReasonWorkflow: abort reason preserved across boundaries (sveltekit)
  • abortSurvivesReplayWorkflow: controller state consistent across replay (tanstack-start)
  • abortThrowIfAbortedWorkflow: throwIfAborted causes FatalError, no retries (nextjs-webpack)
  • addTenWorkflow (nextjs-webpack)
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow (nuxt)
  • getChunks returns same content as reading the stream (astro)
  • getTailIndex returns correct index after stream completes (sveltekit)
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running (astro)
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running (nitro)
  • hookGetConflictWorkflow - hook.getConflict() resolves with the conflicting run when token is already registered (nextjs-turbopack)
  • negative startIndex (reads from end) (express)
  • no startIndex (reads all chunks) (nitro)
  • no startIndex (reads all chunks) (nuxt)
  • outputStreamInsideStepWorkflow - getWritable() called inside step functions (nitro)
  • outputStreamInsideStepWorkflow - getWritable() called inside step functions (nuxt)
  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race (nextjs-turbopack)
  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race (nitro)
  • parallelStepsThenWebhookWorkflow - no hook_conflict from same-tick replay race (tanstack-start)
  • sleepWinsRaceWorkflow (nitro)
  • sleepWinsRaceWorkflow (tanstack-start)
  • utf8StreamWorkflow (nuxt)
  • webhookWorkflow (express)
  • webhookWorkflow (sveltekit)

🛠 Infra Events (absorbed by the harness)

Platform anomalies the e2e harness detected and worked around (e.g. a run the queue never picked up, replaced by a fresh run). Clustered timestamps indicate a backend blip; a steady drip indicates a platform issue worth escalating.

  • cold-start-warmup · suite warmup (tanstack-start) · at 00:35:37Z · abandoned wrun_01M0KE95ET1JS25X5STDK5T5R1
  • run-pickup-stall · Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class (fastify) · at 00:37:12Z · abandoned wrun_01M0KECEEJRK1R7K7YG31NCHAR

E2E Test Summary

Summary
Passed Failed Skipped Total
❌ ▲ Vercel Production 3576 2 742 4320
✅ 💻 Local Development 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 📦 Local Production 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 3922 0 558 4480
✅ 🪟 Windows 160 0 0 160
✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance 9 0 132 141
❌ vercel-http-transport 816 1 143 960
✅ vercel-multi-region 27 0 0 27
✅ vercel-ws-transport 553 0 87 640
Total 16907 3 2778 19688
Details by Category

❌ ▲ Vercel Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-node 132 0 28
✅ astro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ example-node 132 0 28
✅ example-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ express-node 132 0 28
❌ express-quickjs 131 1 28
✅ fastify-node 132 0 28
✅ fastify-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ hono-node 132 0 28
✅ hono-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nest-node 132 0 28
✅ nest-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-node 157 0 3
✅ nextjs-webpack-quickjs 157 0 3
✅ nitro-node 132 0 28
✅ nitro-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-node 132 0 28
✅ nuxt-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ python-node 8 0 152
✅ sveltekit-node 151 0 9
❌ sveltekit-quickjs 150 1 9
✅ tanstack-start-node 132 0 28
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 132 0 28
✅ vite-node 132 0 28
✅ vite-quickjs 132 0 28

✅ 💻 Local Development

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 📦 Local Production

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🐘 Local Postgres

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ astro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ express-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ fastify-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ hono-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nest-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-node 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary-quickjs 141 0 19
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-node 160 0 0
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable-quickjs 160 0 0
✅ nitro-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nitro-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ nuxt-stable-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ sveltekit-stable-node 153 0 7
✅ sveltekit-stable-quickjs 153 0 7
✅ tanstack-start-node 134 0 26
✅ tanstack-start-quickjs 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-node 134 0 26
✅ vite-stable-quickjs 134 0 26

✅ 🪟 Windows

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack-quickjs 160 0 0

✅ 🌐 Cross-language Conformance

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ python 9 0 132

❌ vercel-http-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
❌ express 131 1 28
✅ hono 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ nitro 132 0 28
✅ vite 132 0 28

✅ vercel-multi-region

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 27 0 0

✅ vercel-ws-transport

App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ example 132 0 28
✅ express 132 0 28
✅ nextjs-turbopack 157 0 3
✅ vite 132 0 28

📋 View full workflow run

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📊 Workflow Benchmarks

commit 3ea2135 · Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:49:31 GMT · run logs

Backend: vercel · app: nextjs-turbopack

Metric Scenario Best (ms) P75 (ms) P90 (ms) P99 (ms) Samples
TTFS step 211 (-79%) 💚 1297 🔴 (+13%) 1323 🔴 (+12%) 1346 🔴 (+2.9%) 30
TTFS stream 231 (-78%) 💚 1324 🔴 (+17%) 🔻 1368 🔴 (+17%) 🔻 1404 🔴 (+16%) 🔻 30
TTFS hook + stream 455 (-62%) 💚 1541 🔴 (+8.5%) 1629 🔴 (+8.8%) 1708 🔴 (-11%) 30
Fan-out TTFS Promise.all(100 steps) 565 (-24%) 💚 997 (-48%) 💚 1122 (-42%) 💚 2219 (+9.3%) 10
Fan-out TTLS Promise.all(100 steps) 9742 (+94%) 🔻 16071 (+115%) 🔻 16819 (+113%) 🔻 17975 (+109%) 🔻 10
STSO 1020 steps (inline) 95 (-8.7%) 138 (-2.8%) 161 (±0%) 360 (+85%) 🔻 1019
WO 1020 steps 140874 (-1.2%) 140874 (-1.2%) 140874 (-1.2%) 140874 (-1.2%) 1
CRTT first chunk (pooled) 95 (-22%) 💚 143 (-19%) 💚 234 (+6.4%) 300 (-46%) 💚 28

Streams

Scenario CRTT 1st p75 p90 p99 CDV max iters
paced control (100/s, 60B) 118 (-14%) 262 (-44%) 365 (-44%) 964 (-82%) 239 (+54%) 10
size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB) 123 (-25%) 142 (-29%) 208 (-32%) 745 (+64%) 155 (-17%) 10
replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x) 119 (-34%) 131 (-50%) 178 (-69%) 304 (-79%) 218 (-73%) 3
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x) 128 (-15%) 144 (-23%) 181 (-48%) 366 (-73%) 368 (-54%) 2
replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x) 131 (-26%) 316 (+17%) 2968 (+683%) 4521 (+534%) 3388 (+816%) 3
📈 STSO distribution vs main (inline / queue-hop histograms)

1020 steps (inline)

Cumulative STSO time: main 142387ms → this run 140687ms (Δ -1700ms, -1%)

 50-100 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   3    +3
100-150 ms  ███████████████████████┃  main 869  this 857   -12
150-200 ms  ██┃█                      main 143  this 113   -30
200-250 ms  ┃                         main   5  this  23   +18
250-300 ms  ┃                         main   2  this   6    +4
300-350 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   4    +4
350-400 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   5    +5
400-450 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   4    +4
450-500 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   2    +2
550-600 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
850-900 ms  ┃                         main   0  this   1    +1
📈 CRTT drill-down vs main (RTT distributions & profiles)
variant  RTT 1ms→5s+              avg         p50           p90           p99     n
control  ······▄█▄▁···   168.1 (-70%)  124 (-18%)    365 (-44%)    964 (-82%)  3000
sweep    ······▆█▁▁···   127.6 (-23%)  112 (-26%)    208 (-32%)    745 (+64%)  3000
gw 1x    ·····▁██▁····   112.2 (-44%)  102 (-26%)    178 (-69%)    304 (-79%)  5295
eve 1x   ·····▁▆█▁▁···   119.1 (-32%)  104 (-21%)    181 (-48%)    366 (-73%)  5186
eve 2x   ·····▁▃█▃▁▁▂·  495.5 (+144%)  152 (-13%)  2968 (+683%)  4521 (+534%)  7779

RTT over stream progress (avg per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  █▅▅▃▁▅▄▅▃▄  140–197ms
sweep    ▄▂▁▂▅█▅▂▃▁  111–159ms
gw 1x    ▄▂▄▅▂█▅▃▁▃  100–130ms
eve 1x   ▄▁▂▂▂▁▄█▃▁  105–162ms
eve 2x   ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▂█▄  122–2357ms

RTT by chunk size (avg per log size bin, ~160B → ~12KB serialized, bars scaled min→max):

sweep  ▂▃▅█▆▁▃  125–131ms

Delivery jitter over stream progress (avg positive CDV per tenth of stream, bars scaled min→max):

control  ▄█▂▁▂▅▁▁▁▂  35–63ms
sweep    ▁▂▄▅█▂▂▃▅▄  39–66ms
gw 1x    ▂▃▄▁▂▇█▅▁▁  29–40ms
eve 1x   █▁▃▂▃▂▇▇▄▄  20–28ms
eve 2x   ▂▂▁▂▂▂▂█▁▂  20–70ms
ℹ️ Metric definitions & methodology

Streams: first-chunk RTT (the stream-open path, before any buffering/backpressure), CRTT percentiles, and worst delivery stall (CDV max). Cells are medians across iterations; per-run values in the artifacts. No 🔴/🟢 marks until targets attach.

The collapsed STSO distribution section above buckets every step gap, split inline (same warm process — pure framework overhead) vs queue-hop (fresh process — dispatch, reinit, replay). = main, = this run, = fill.

The collapsed CRTT drill-down: per-variant RTT histograms (fixed log bins, · = empty) and mean RTT/positive-CDV profile lines over stream progress and chunk size. Histograms, avgs, and profiles merge exactly across runs; p50–p99 are percentile-of-percentiles. Per-index rows live in the artifacts.

Best/P75/P90/P99 deltas compare against the most recent benchmark run on main at the time of this run. 🔻 flags a delta worse than +15%, 💚 one better than −15%.

Metrics — TTFS: time to first step body (in-deployment start() → first step body) · Fan-out TTFS: fan-out time to first step (in-deployment start() → first of the parallel step bodies to complete) · Fan-out TTLS: fan-out time to last step (in-deployment start() → last of the parallel step bodies to complete, i.e. when the Promise.all resolves) · STSO: step-to-step overhead (gap between consecutive step bodies) · WO: workflow overhead (whole-run time outside step bodies, in-deployment anchored) · CRTT: chunk round-trip time (per-chunk write → read latency, one clock domain: deployment → stream backend → same deployment) · CDV: chunk delay variation / delivery jitter (inter-arrival gap minus inter-write gap per seq-adjacent pair; skew-free; the row is each run's MAX positive value, so one stall moves it)

Scenarios — step: one trivial no-op step, no stream; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · stream: one streaming step; no hooks, so the run stays in turbo mode (in-process fast path) · hook + stream: registers a hook before one step, which exits turbo mode (dispatch path) · 1020 steps: 1020 trivial sequential steps; STSO is measured between consecutive steps in the given step ranges, and WO is the whole-run overhead outside step bodies · Promise.all(100 steps): 100 trivial no-op steps started together in a single Promise.all; Fan-out TTFS is the first of them to complete and Fan-out TTLS the last, both from the in-deployment clientStart, so their gap is the spread the runtime adds across the fan-out · paced control (100/s, 60B): the control: 300 tiny (~60B) deltas metronome-paced at 100/s — zero workload structure, so it reads the transport floor and flush cadence, and disambiguates transport-wide vs workload-specific when a replay row moves · size sweep (100/s, 160B-12KB): same pacing as the control with deltas padded in rotation across seven log-spaced sizes (~160B–12KB) — rotation decouples size from stream position, so it isolates whether chunk size causes latency · replay gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t (1x): raw provider SSE cadence captured at the AI gateway boundary (gpt-5.4-nano, the most popular gateway model; per-token deltas p50 208B = the modal production chunk size), replayed exactly as measured — the typical customer's workload; its CDV is the typical customer's real delivery jitter · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (1x): a captured eve turn (gpt-5.6-sol, the most-used demanding eve model; ~2000 output tokens = production p50 turn length) replayed exactly as measured — eve's envelope protocol re-ships the cumulative message so sizes ramp 142B→13KB; the demanding outlier tenant's reality · replay eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t (2x): the same eve capture at 2x — the headroom/stress row; real fast-tier models emit the same chunk sizes at proportionally higher rate, so time compression is a faithful speed model · first chunk (pooled): every run's seq-0 RTT pooled across all stream scenarios — the first chunk precedes any workload differentiation, so pooling samples one shared stream-open path with exact percentiles

Replay cadences (semantic sha256) — eve-gpt-5.6-sol-2000t eaf22f5946e7c61f3c65c7006d550df180cfabd4e706254a09f22aec0cfb420d · gateway-gpt-5.4-nano-2000t 6f24ac518b6b83ff1d0e85a5fe78230db192716d66a7fc6b2fe022752001d041

🔴 marks a percentile over its target (within target is left unmarked). Targets (p75/p90/p99, ms) — TTFS 200/300/600

All timestamps are deployment-side; runs are triggered in-deployment, so the CI runner and api.vercel.com sit outside every measured window. TTFS = start() → first step body (includes dispatch + any cold start); Fan-out TTFS/TTLS = first/last step completion of one Promise.all from the same anchor (the gap is the runtime’s fan-out spread); STSO/WO between step bodies; CRTT inside the workflow (excludes the api.vercel.com read path).

Cold starts stay in the numbers (real bursty-workload latency, inflates P75+); Best is the warm floor.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sim World

Simulated world deterministic testing for races. Traces

🟠 world-sim scenario book — 1 fail of 41 total

fence=per-spec

scenario outcome events virt replay violations
smoke-no-steps completed 3 0ms ok 0
smoke-one-step completed 6 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-started completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-step-completed completed 12 0ms ok 0
hook-at-hook-created completed 12 0ms ok 0
deadline-hook-wins completed 7 1.0h ok 0
deadline-expires completed 7 1.0h ok 0
long-sleep completed 11 30.0d ok 0
hook-never-arrives stalled 3 0ms skipped 0
step-retries-twice completed 10 2.0s ok 0
parallel-steps completed 9 0ms ok 0
hook-on-execution-state completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-before-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-after-branch completed 12 0ms ok 0
peek-hook-at-registration completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-before-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-hook-after-probe completed 12 0ms ok 0
race-duplicate-delivery completed 13 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-before-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-hook-after-step completed 11 0ms ok 0
attr-from-step-body completed 13 0ms ok 0
fork-hook-after-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-before-timeout completed 14 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-after-timeout completed 17 1.0m ok 0
count-hook-before-timeout completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork completed 20 1.0m ok 0
stale-read-equal-step-counts completed 14 1.0m ok 0
step-vs-step-fork completed 12 0ms ok 0
step-vs-step-fork-fenced completed 12 0ms ok 0
fence-catches-benign-direction completed 12 5ms ok 0
in-flight-before-decision completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-before-decision-counted completed 17 1.0m ok 0
in-flight-after-decision completed 19 2.0m ok 0
stale-read-step-count-fork-fenced completed 20 1.0m ok 0
fork-hook-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
fork-timeout-wins completed 13 1.0m ok 0
unclaimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
claimed-payload-under-fork completed 17 1.0m ok 0
writers-independent-step-bodies completed 12 0ms ok 0
writers-scripted-tempo completed 12 0ms ok 0
cancel-mid-step cancelled 7 0ms skipped 0

Full trace: world-sim.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant