Skip to content

Handling AI Search Gaps for the period April - mid August - #802

Open
dessyordanova wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
dess-ai-search-gap
Open

Handling AI Search Gaps for the period April - mid August#802
dessyordanova wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
dess-ai-search-gap

Conversation

@dessyordanova

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please review and validate the suggested changes and extract the code snippets from the Markdown files.

Decision
Recommend — Clarify that fixed documents do not retain flow paragraphs and document the supported page/content model.
Confidence: High
Gap: Incomplete content

Why
Customer need: Determine how to enumerate paragraph content from a RadFixedDocument.
Current gap: Existing documentation discusses flow paragraphs and fixed page content separately, without explicitly explaining that paragraphs are not available after fixed-layout rendering.
Preferred approach: Extend the existing RadFixedDocument model article with a fixed-versus-flow explanation and the supported enumeration path.
Not selected: Creating a new article would duplicate the existing model and editor documentation.
Decision
Recommend — Update the existing custom-function formula documentation with the accessibility limitation and public replacement APIs.
Confidence: High
Gap: Incomplete content

Why
Customer need: Retrieve the first referenced range or its evaluated array values.
Current gap: Existing content covers range and array handling but does not explain that FirstRangeArray is internal.
Preferred approach: Add guidance to the existing custom-functions resource.
Not selected: A new article would duplicate existing array and custom-function guidance.
Decision
Recommend — Clarify the existing calculation-chain documentation using the exact COM Interop terminology.
Confidence: High
Gap: Incomplete content with terminology mismatch

Why
Customer need: Know whether Telerik provides a replacement for Application.CalculateFullRebuild().
Current gap: Existing content explains automatic recalculation but does not explicitly answer the COM Interop comparison.
Preferred approach: Update the existing calculation-chain article, avoiding duplicate content. Add a section explaining that no public full-rebuild method exists; recalculation is dependency-driven and automatic
Not selected: New KB article ranks lower because the existing formula documentation already owns this behavior.
Decision
Recommend with confirmation — Expand the existing RadPdfProcessing digital-signature getting-started article with verified PKCS#12/PFX certificate-loading guidance after confirming the .NET API and target versions.

Confidence: Medium
Gap: Missing example or troubleshooting

Why
Customer need: Load a PKCS#12 file and use the resulting certificate to sign a PDF.
Current gap: Documentation starts with an existing X509Certificate2 but omits the file-loading step.
Preferred approach: Extend the existing certificate prerequisites/signing workflow.
Not selected: A new KB article, because certificate preparation belongs in the existing digital-signature getting-started resource.
Decision
Recommend with confirmation — Add PKI terminology to the existing RadPdfProcessing digital-signature overview, scoped to certificate-based signing and validation.

Confidence: Medium
Gap: Terminology mismatch / missing metadata

Why
Customer need: Understand how PKI relates to Telerik Document Processing.
Current gap: The docs cover X.509 certificates, trusted roots, certificate chains, revocation, and digital signatures, but do not use “PKI” or “Public Key Infrastructure.”
Preferred approach: Add the terminology to the existing digital-signature overview rather than create a generic PKI article.
Not selected: A standalone PKI guide, because the repositories do not show Telerik APIs for certificate issuance, certificate-authority management, or general PKI administration.
@dessyordanova dessyordanova self-assigned this Aug 12, 2026
@dessyordanova
dessyordanova requested a review from YoanKar August 12, 2026 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant