Added a new embed when someone starts boosting#17
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 55 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds shared ChangesDiscord client typing and boost notifications
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/events/guildMemberUpdate.ts`:
- Around line 168-188: Update the guild-member boost notification flow to reuse
the existing top-level guild variable instead of refetching and shadowing it. In
the ContainerBuilder construction, only add the thumbnail accessory when
guild.iconURL() returns a valid URL; do not pass an empty string to setURL,
while preserving the existing message and DM behavior.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: d56780fd-51c5-4f11-a09e-8fbc3fe0cc81
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
src/base/types/chalk.tssrc/base/types/discord.tssrc/events/activityUpdate.tssrc/events/clientReady.tssrc/events/guildMemberUpdate.tssrc/events/helpautocomplete.tssrc/events/interactionCreate.tssrc/events/onServerAdd.tssrc/events/roleCleanup.tssrc/events/setupResponse.tssrc/index.tssrc/libs/logger.ts
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🚀 Summary
✨ Features
DiscordClientandChalkColorstypes.♻️ Improvements