Skip to content

feat: o11y eval suites - #256

Draft
smeubank wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/o11y-evals
Draft

feat: o11y eval suites #256
smeubank wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
feat/o11y-evals

Conversation

@smeubank

@smeubank smeubank commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I was working on a chaos project on the side, which should inject a "probe" that would match every advisor we have today, WIP health checks, and referenced checks from apps our customer support and success use to help work with customers.

The goal being to have one place with all these checks to test against models, and see where more skills and advisors could help. This was for sure very AI assisted in generation. Splinter advisors are really just SQL lints so the model is not super complex to convert for evals.

  • 36 MCP evals (PGlite): 31/36 pass with skills, 33/36 without
  • 10 CLI evals (Docker): 8/9 pass (storage-cors-wildcard is valid signal)
  • 1 cron-wrong-owner stub (blocked: cron.job owned by supabase_admin)
  • o11y-README.md: coverage table with advisor status and local results. This for context of this draft for any reviewers.

i chose the o11y prefix, and numbers where it matched an existing advisor.

The goal is not to merge this as-is

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

feature: adding an o11y sweet

What is the current behavior?

there are investigate and resolve evals already but we could add more, and really we should add more with tiers of complexity. None of these are tooo complex.

I would say the advisors today do not have broad enough coverage across all product surfaces. The evals that do not match to an existing advisors have the side goal of mitigating that. Eval -> advisor if it makes sense.

What is the new behavior?

There's about 50 new o11y evals.

Additional context

image

Converts the chaos-o11y probe library into a full eval suite under the
o11y- prefix. Probe numbers are retained in directory names for easy
cross-referencing (e.g. o11y-0003-resolve-security-rls-initplan).

- 36 MCP evals (PGlite): 31/36 pass with skills, 33/36 without
- 10 CLI evals (Docker): 8/9 pass (storage-cors-wildcard is valid signal)
- 1 cron-wrong-owner stub (blocked: cron.job owned by supabase_admin)
- o11y-README.md: coverage table with advisor status and local results

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated
evals Ignored Ignored Preview Sep 2, 2026 7:57pm UTC

Request Review

also reviewed structure of exsiting evals against the healthchecks we are currently adding, and reviewed the prompts and notes that they don't "spoil" the eal by explaining the snapshot behavior
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant