chore: act upon SonarQube warnings#3307
Conversation
2225f9b to
f85e00a
Compare
|
Changes already applied into the main branch. |
|
@bnasslahsen Do you happen to still have access to the SonarQube for the project? I would assume that the checks might pass now if this issue is marked as a false positive. The common-lang bump also introduced a regression, where now the deprecated methods are used again (the |
|
Yes i have access to it: https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?impactSeverities=HIGH&issueStatuses=OPEN%2CCONFIRMED&branch=main&id=springdoc_springdoc-openapi I will work on it to get it fixed |


This further acts upon SonarQube warnings. The previous change brought down warnings from 50 to 31, this should reduce it quite a bit further.
Do note that it will most likely be necessary to at least mark this issue as "accepted/invalid", since the project is failing due to insufficient reliability rating

but the issues highlighted is not possible to fix since the suggested
instanceOfcannot be applied out of the box since the class is package private.