[waleedlatif1]

Summary

• Restructured the open source AI agents guide around the head term: title Best Open Source AI Agents and Platforms in 2026, seoTitle Open Source AI Agents: Best Platforms in 2026.
• Answer-first intro naming the top picks, a Sim publisher disclosure, a "choose X when / choose Sim when" box, and a quick-picks table (tool, best for, license, self-host).
• Body H2s 19 -> 6 (question-shaped). Merged the "Key facts", side-by-side, workflow-builder matrix, Key Takeaways and Conclusion sections into one comparison table plus one numbered H3 per tool (best for, pricing, strengths, limitations, sources). Sim gets plain limitations.
• Body words 5,748 -> 3,620. FAQs 40 -> 38: merged near-duplicates (n8n and Zapier alternative pairs, self-hosting pair, non-developers/no-code pair, "what to compare" pair), added "Is AutoGen still maintained?" and "Is Dify open source?", rephrased Sim superlatives by fit, and cut answers to 1-2 sentences.
• Factual corrections: AutoGen's README now says the project is archived and no longer maintained by Microsoft (was "maintenance mode"); its last release is 0.7.5 from September 30, 2025 (was listed as 2026). Added Microsoft Agent Framework (MIT) as the successor and AG2's v1.0 split into AG2 and AG2 Classic. Flowise now reflects its August 31, 2026 end of life. OpenHands now describes Agent Canvas, its MIT-licensed release; the old enterprise/ license split is gone. The n8n integration count now quotes both official pages (500+ and 2,000+).
• Dropped the self-scored weighted ranking table, and repointed the link to the retiring multi-step builders slug at best-ai-workflow-builders.
• Left best-multi-agent-frameworks-2026 unchanged because its title does not compete for "open source ai agents".

Type of Change

• Documentation

Testing

• bun run scripts/check-library-content.ts --slug library/open-source-ai-agent-platforms is clean.
• Every star count, archive flag, license and latest release was re-pulled from the GitHub API and raw LICENSE/README files on 2026-10-20.
• Prices were checked against the raw HTML of dify.ai/pricing, crewai.com/pricing, n8n.io/pricing and langchain.com/pricing.
• Flowise dates come from flowiseai.com/sunset and the GitHub archive banner. The AutoGen successor date comes from the Microsoft Foundry blog.
• n8n, Dify and CrewAI claims were checked against their docs. Sim facts were checked against the billing constants, env schema and self-hosting, deployment, BYOK and Human-block docs in the repo.

Checklist

• Code follows project style guidelines
• Self-reviewed my changes
• Tests added/updated and passing (new tests pass the test-audit authoring gate)
• No new warnings introduced
• I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms outlined in the Contributor License Agreement (CLA)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
docs	Skipped		Oct 20, 2026 11:39pm UTC

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 1 file

Confidence score: 5/5

• Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
• No files require special attention.

_{Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic}

[greptile-apps]

Confidence Score: 5/5

[Low impact] The documentation changes appear safe to merge.

Summary

Restructures the guide around “open source AI agents,” with shorter sections, clearer buying advice, and updated comparisons.

• The guide opens with a direct answer and a quick route to the right tools.
• Readers can shortlist tools by fit and license before comparing them.
• Each tool gets a clear profile and updated status in the comparison.
• Readers choose tools by use case and weigh hosting separately.

_{Reviews (2) · Last reviewed commit: "fix(library): correct plan, count, and f..." · Reviewed by Greptile}

[waleedlatif1]

@greptile

[waleedlatif1]

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

[cubic-dev-ai]

@cubic-dev-ai review this PR

@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete.

[cubic-dev-ai]

No issues found across 1 file

Confidence score: 5/5

• Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
• No files require special attention.

_{Turn on auto-fix | Re-trigger cubic}