Pro: split access from display, and stop upselling an active plan - #2164

Draft

mpretty-cyro wants to merge 16 commits into

session-foundation:devfrom

mpretty-cyro:fix/expiring-cta-confirmed-fetch

Commits on Aug 14, 2026

Pro: let a QA build force a successful status refresh
mpretty-cyro
committed
236568f
Pro: fetch on startup when a proof exists without an access expiry
mpretty-cyro
committed
904cd4d
Pro: only refresh status when the synced access expiry actually changes
mpretty-cyro
committed
1f367c7
Pro: don't warn about an expiry the backend has not confirmed
mpretty-cyro
committed
baebc0a
Pro: don't refresh status when the settings list opens
mpretty-cyro
committed
94563c3
Add an accessibility id to the Pro settings row's title
mpretty-cyro
committed
b6463d5
Pro: derive our own ACCESS from the proof, and read it where it is enforced
mpretty-cyro
committed
baf5680
QA: split the Pro status mock so DISPLAY can be mocked without granting ACCESS
mpretty-cyro
committed
edfbbbc
Pro: say payment-due, not paid-through, for the reported expiry
mpretty-cyro
committed
bc79d33
QA: one lever per fact — proBackendStatus drives DISPLAY, sessionProProof drives ACCESS
mpretty-cyro
committed
225b4bd
QA: an absent sessionProProof clears the override rather than leaving it
mpretty-cyro
committed
7a5e7c2
Pro: the compose limit is ACCESS, but the dialog that explains it is DISPLAY
mpretty-cyro
committed
173e92d
Pro: the upsell affordances read DISPLAY, not inverted ACCESS
mpretty-cyro
committed
c17185e
Pro: route the second pin gate through the ACCESS function too
mpretty-cyro
committed
64ed616
Pro: split ProStatus.Active so a dateless Active is expressible
mpretty-cyro
committed
4566c94
Pro: seed DISPLAY from the proof, unfloor the expiry duration, and give an Active plan no CTA
mpretty-cyro
committed
6adf62a

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

Pro: split access from display, and stop upselling an active plan - #2164

Pro: split access from display, and stop upselling an active plan#2164
mpretty-cyro wants to merge 16 commits into
session-foundation:devfrom
mpretty-cyro:fix/expiring-cta-confirmed-fetch

Commits on Aug 14, 2026

Pro: let a QA build force a successful status refresh

Pro: fetch on startup when a proof exists without an access expiry

Pro: only refresh status when the synced access expiry actually changes

Pro: don't warn about an expiry the backend has not confirmed

Pro: don't refresh status when the settings list opens

Add an accessibility id to the Pro settings row's title

Pro: derive our own ACCESS from the proof, and read it where it is enforced

QA: split the Pro status mock so DISPLAY can be mocked without granting ACCESS

Pro: say payment-due, not paid-through, for the reported expiry

QA: one lever per fact — proBackendStatus drives DISPLAY, sessionProProof drives ACCESS

QA: an absent sessionProProof clears the override rather than leaving it

Pro: the compose limit is ACCESS, but the dialog that explains it is DISPLAY

Pro: the upsell affordances read DISPLAY, not inverted ACCESS

Pro: route the second pin gate through the ACCESS function too

Pro: split ProStatus.Active so a dateless Active is expressible

Pro: seed DISPLAY from the proof, unfloor the expiry duration, and give an Active plan no CTA