Skip to content

Find a way to represent cards in a maximized, generic sense for backwards compatibility #10

Description

@scarletcs

ScryfallCards.Any has been received relatively well, with one major setback: many existing systems depend on a more generic system where every card has every possible field present as optional.

We could just do without it, but it'd be helpful to people to provide a card type that has the following properties:

  • All fields that exist on literally every layout will be guaranteed.
  • All fields that MIGHT exist on SOME type will be present but possibly undefined.

The main hangup in this case is Reversible cards which omit several properties usually found present.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions