Skip to content

Revise Runner upgrade documentation for clarity - #1934

Merged
fdevans merged 1 commit into
rundeck:4.0.xfrom
MegaDrive68k:MegaDrive68k-upgrading-runners
Aug 20, 2026
Merged

Revise Runner upgrade documentation for clarity#1934
fdevans merged 1 commit into
rundeck:4.0.xfrom
MegaDrive68k:MegaDrive68k-upgrading-runners

Conversation

@MegaDrive68k

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updated documentation on upgrading Runners to clarify the role of Replicas and the upgrade process for various environments, including virtual machines, Docker, and Kubernetes.

Updated documentation on upgrading Runners to clarify the role of Replicas and the upgrade process for various environments, including virtual machines, Docker, and Kubernetes.
@MegaDrive68k
MegaDrive68k requested review from a team and a lite review from Copilot August 20, 2026 18:40

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Runner upgrade documentation to reflect the Runner Replicas model (Self-Hosted 5.16.0+), clarifying how “upgrading a Runner” works across persistent (manual) and ephemeral (orchestrated) deployments.

Changes:

  • Reframes upgrades around replacing/upgrading Replicas (rolling upgrade semantics) and documents expected behavior during version skew.
  • Adds distinct, step-by-step procedures for Persistent Replicas (GUI + REST API) vs. Ephemeral Replicas (Docker/Kubernetes/orchestration-driven).
  • Adds a clearly separated legacy procedure for Self-Hosted 5.x environments where the Replicas feature is disabled.

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@fdevans fdevans added this to the 6.2.0 milestone Aug 20, 2026
@fdevans
fdevans merged commit a150077 into rundeck:4.0.x Aug 20, 2026
1 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants