Skip to content

chore: sync prs to linear with latest workflow - #116

Merged
gabrielmfern merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/update-linear-pr-sync-55e6
Jul 10, 2026
Merged

chore: sync prs to linear with latest workflow#116
gabrielmfern merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/update-linear-pr-sync-55e6

Conversation

@gabrielmfern

@gabrielmfern gabrielmfern commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • add the daily PR-to-Linear sync workflow
  • pin the shared action to f6bdeec8e632f07b158cd1e3cd3ac70f59463288

Validation

  • actionlint passes
Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Summary by cubic

Add a GitHub Actions workflow to sync open PRs to Linear daily at 10:00 UTC. Pins resend/public-shared-workflows/.github/actions/sync_prs_to_linear to commit f6bdeec8e632f07b158cd1e3cd3ac70f59463288.

  • New Features
    • Runs on cron 0 10 * * * and supports workflow_dispatch.
    • Uses secrets LINEAR_API_KEY, LINEAR_TEAM_ID, and github.token.

Written for commit 6a686d1. Summary will update on new commits.

Review in cubic

Co-authored-by: Gabriel Miranda <gabrielmfern@outlook.com>

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All reported issues were addressed across 1 file

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Safe to merge after the addressed issues were fixed.

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Re-trigger cubic

Comment thread .github/workflows/sync-prs-to-linear.yml
Comment thread .github/workflows/sync-prs-to-linear.yml
@gabrielmfern
gabrielmfern marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2026 13:37
@gabrielmfern
gabrielmfern merged commit dae0496 into main Jul 10, 2026
6 checks passed
@gabrielmfern
gabrielmfern deleted the cursor/update-linear-pr-sync-55e6 branch July 10, 2026 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants