Skip to content

Added materials for Docling vs LlamaParse tutorial - #787

Open
nunombispo wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
pdf-table-extraction-docling-vs-llamaparse
Open

Added materials for Docling vs LlamaParse tutorial#787
nunombispo wants to merge 5 commits into
masterfrom
pdf-table-extraction-docling-vs-llamaparse

Conversation

@nunombispo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Where to put new files:

  • New files should go into a top-level subfolder, named after the article slug. For example: my-awesome-article

How to merge your changes:

  1. Make sure the CI code style tests all pass (+ run the automatic code formatter if necessary).
  2. Find an RP Team member on Slack and ask them to review & approve your PR.
  3. Once the PR has one positive ("approved") review, GitHub lets you merge the PR.
  4. 🎉

@realpython-bot realpython-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@stephengruppetta One-line README fix. The tutorial link in this README points at realpython.com/pdf-table-extraction-docling-vs-llamaparse/, which 403s. The CMS slug is now extract-table-from-pdf-python (changed today for the keyphrase), so the link needs to follow.

I checked the rest of the folder against the article while I was here: all five scripts match the tutorial's code blocks logically, and requirements.txt matches the article's install commands. No other drift.

Comment thread pdf-table-extraction-docling-vs-llamaparse/README.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Real Python Bot <42617967+realpython-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
@stephengruppetta
stephengruppetta self-requested a review July 30, 2026 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants