Fall back to the vendor os-release file when etc is absent - #86
Open
OskarEichler wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
OskarEichler wants to merge 2 commits into
OskarEichler wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
A Linux installation containing only
/usr/lib/os-releasecurrently raises. Use it when/etc/os-releaseis absent; never merge the two files.Reproduction and verification
Checked vendor-only, both-files, empty-etc and neither-file fixtures, without reading or altering system configuration. See the upstream format and precedence specification.
RBENV_VERSION=4.0.6 rbenv exec rspec -Ilib -Ispec).Breaking-change notes
Existing
/etc/os-releasedata, including an empty file, retains precedence. A previously rejected vendor-only installation now succeeds; the missing-file error identifies the attempted path.