Skip to content

Will quickwit support storing Prometheus metrics? #3819

Closed

Description

@batmilkyway

As an SRE/platform/cloud/whatever engineer I'd like to self-host my observability tools to reduce costs (DataDog, New Relic, etc are quite costly). One of the pain points with self-hosting is that tools are either fragmented, or require heavy infrastructure investment.

For example, the LGTM stack requires deploying Loki, Tempo, and Mimir (or other Prometheus compatible store) to capture logs, metrics, and traces.

Other projects like SigNoz or Uptrace, which do support a unified observability store, do it with ClickHouse, which can be pretty resource hungry and also incurs operational overhead.

Quickwit already supports logs and traces, will it also support metrics?

Activity

  1. guilload commented on Sep 13, 2023

    @guilload
    Member

    Hello @batmilkyway,

    We want to support metrics eventually, but this will require much work because inverted indexes are not best suited for storing/querying metrics. However, I doubt we can work on this anytime soon because we are already quite busy with other higher-priority features.

  2. batmilkyway commented on Sep 16, 2023

    @batmilkyway
    Author

    Thank you for the reply, looking forward to when it lands!

  3. locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Sep 17, 2023
  4. converted this issue into a discussion #3843 on Sep 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions