Implement Mixed Magnitude Approximation - #1925
Draft
Acciaccatura wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
hi! i tried to attempt a solution for mixed magnitude approximation (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.10064) for #1759 - though I have a few issues that hopefully the Qualtran team can help me with? (forgive me, I don't have much QC experience!)
but a small percentage of the time (~0.2%) this produces two under-rotations - it seems the$H$ rotations add some error from the complex component of $Z_{1, 0}$ . is this tolerable? if not, should I be trying to create my own
ApproxProblemsubclass for this?UnitaryChannel.diamond_norm_distance_to_unitarylike this, this results in a higher error than the solution says in Proposition 3.22 (my error isthanks for taking a look!