feat: add citation-aware RAG - #375
Draft
cpsievert wants to merge 3 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why this matters
Chatlas can now ground answers in a user-provided retrieval store and return structured citations to the specific supporting document passages. This makes RAG answers inspectable in both standard and streamed chats, rather than relying on unverified model prose.
What’s included
chat.rag.register_store()for attaching retrieval stores to a conversation.ContentCitationvalues with document identity and the cited source text.scripts/rag_citations_demo.pyverification example.Verification
116 passed, 2 xfailed.1030 passed, 3 skipped, 2 xfailed; 8 unrelated Bedrock VCR failures remain because the current default Sonnet 4.6 model does not match the committed Sonnet 4.5 cassettes.