Skip to content

fix(runner): stream --ids sources and cap selection to the pinned set - #47

Open
SebTardif wants to merge 2 commits into
openclaw:mainfrom
SebTardif:fix/ids-stream-semantic-bound
Open

fix(runner): stream --ids sources and cap selection to the pinned set#47
SebTardif wants to merge 2 commits into
openclaw:mainfrom
SebTardif:fix/ids-stream-semantic-bound

Conversation

@SebTardif

@SebTardif SebTardif commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Problem This Solves

Fixes an issue where clawscan benchmark --ids could exhaust memory. readBenchmarkIDSource did an unbounded io.ReadAll on HTTP sources (and os.ReadFile on local files). Follow-up to #45, which @steipete closed: a 256 KiB HTTP-only cap would reject the documented full SkillTrustBench ID list (5,520 cases, about 1.3 MiB of canonical JSONL) and left files unbounded.

The first head still kept every parsed id in memory up to the 5,520-count cap. A hostile source can send 5,520 unique records that are each far larger than a real case id. This tip also caps one extracted id at 256 bytes and retained id text at 256 KiB. Those are not JSONL file-size limits, so the documented 5,520-id / 1.3 MiB SkillTrustBench stream still parses.

Why This Change Was Made

Stream file and HTTP --ids sources through the same line parser. Bound the selection by case count (5,520 unique IDs, the pinned SkillTrustBench full set), one-id length (256 bytes), and retained id text (256 KiB). Do not copy the 256 KiB plugin-manifest limit onto the JSONL stream.

User Impact

A hostile or accidental multi-gigabyte --ids URL no longer has to be fully buffered. A valid full-set JSONL list still loads. More than 5,520 unique IDs, a single id longer than 256 bytes, or more than 256 KiB of retained id text is rejected before the benchmark run starts.

Evidence

Terminal output from the public CLI built at 6baa16f. Selection load rejects the new retained-id bounds and still accepts a 299600-byte JSONL file (larger than 256 KiB):

$ /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-huge-id.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
--ids source /tmp/clawscan-huge-id.txt line 1 exceeds the 256-byte benchmark id limit
exit status 1
$ /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-agg-ids.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
--ids source /tmp/clawscan-agg-ids.txt exceeds the 262144-byte retained-id budget
exit status 1
$ /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-too-many-ids.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
--ids source /tmp/clawscan-too-many-ids.txt exceeds the 5520-id SkillTrustBench selection limit
exit status 1

A 400-row JSONL fixture (299600 bytes) loads from a file. The CLI then looks up selected ids in SkillTrustBench, which proves selection finished and the 256 KiB stream cap is not applied:

$ wc -c /tmp/clawscan-large-ids.jsonl
299600 /tmp/clawscan-large-ids.jsonl
$ /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-large-ids.jsonl --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-large-out.json
--ids requested benchmark id case_00046, but it is missing from SkillTrustBench split benchmark
exit status 1

The same 400-id selection also loads from HTTP (loaded count=400, matching sha256 835384f6bb8da14b7a7db4cdf6fc1c844331eaa3a05244064f9351b58d69e1bb).

make docs-site on this tree: Built 7 docs page(s) in dist/docs-site. Generated dist/ was not committed.

Real behavior proof

  • Behavior or issue addressed: --ids no longer does an unbounded full-body read. One extracted id is capped at 256 bytes and retained id text at 256 KiB. A valid JSONL list larger than 256 KiB still loads.

  • Real environment tested: macOS, Go toolchain, branch fix/ids-stream-semantic-bound at 6baa16f, public CLI binary /tmp/clawscan-47 built from that tree.

  • Exact steps or command run after this patch:

    python3 -c "from pathlib import Path; Path('/tmp/clawscan-huge-id.txt').write_text('a'*257+'\n')"
    /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-huge-id.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
    /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-agg-ids.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
    /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-too-many-ids.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
    /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-large-ids.jsonl --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-large-out.json
  • Evidence after fix: terminal output from the public CLI on 6baa16f:

    $ /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-huge-id.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
    --ids source /tmp/clawscan-huge-id.txt line 1 exceeds the 256-byte benchmark id limit
    exit status 1
    $ /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-agg-ids.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
    --ids source /tmp/clawscan-agg-ids.txt exceeds the 262144-byte retained-id budget
    exit status 1
    $ /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-too-many-ids.txt --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-ids-out.json
    --ids source /tmp/clawscan-too-many-ids.txt exceeds the 5520-id SkillTrustBench selection limit
    exit status 1
    $ wc -c /tmp/clawscan-large-ids.jsonl
    299600 /tmp/clawscan-large-ids.jsonl
    $ /tmp/clawscan-47 benchmark SkillTrustBench --ids /tmp/clawscan-large-ids.jsonl --scanner clawscan-static --output /tmp/clawscan-large-out.json
    --ids requested benchmark id case_00046, but it is missing from SkillTrustBench split benchmark
    exit status 1
  • Observed result after fix: The CLI exits 1 at selection load for a 257-byte id, for 2000 retained ids over the 262144-byte budget, and for 5521 ids. A 299600-byte JSONL source is accepted and the next error is a missing SkillTrustBench row, not a stream-size reject. Hugging Face row fetch is not started on the reject paths.

  • What was not tested: A live Hugging Face --ids URL for the full 5,520-row JSONL (about 1.3 MiB). Coverage for that size class is the 400-row file and HTTP fixture (299600 bytes).

Summary

  • What changed: stream --ids file and HTTP sources; cap unique IDs at the pinned SkillTrustBench set size; cap one id at 256 bytes and retained id text at 256 KiB.
  • Why: unbounded ReadAll/ReadFile can exhaust memory; a 256 KiB HTTP file-size cap rejects valid documented input; a count-only cap still lets 5,520 huge records stay in memory.

Scope

  • CLI behavior
  • Judge/profile/benchmark behavior

Security / Trust Impact

  • Security/trust impact explained

Unbounded remote --ids bodies are no longer fully buffered. Limits are the SkillTrustBench case count, a 256-byte per-id cap, and a 256 KiB retained-id-text budget, documented in docs/benchmarks.md.

Verification

  • Focused scanner/benchmark/manual proof: public CLI reject of a 257-byte id, a 262144-byte retained-id budget overflow, and 5521 IDs; public CLI accept of a 299600-byte JSONL source (above)
  • Docs site proof (make docs-site) or N/A: Built 7 docs page(s) in dist/docs-site (generated dist/ not committed)

Ref #45

PLAN: HTTP and file --ids loaders used unbounded ReadAll. PR 45 capped
HTTP at 256 KiB, which rejects the valid 1.3 MiB full SkillTrustBench
JSONL list and left local files unbounded.

DO: stream both sources through the existing line parser and reject
more than 5520 unique IDs, the pinned SkillTrustBench full set.

Signed-off-by: Sebastien Tardif <sebtardif@ncf.ca>
@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦞👀
ClawSweeper picked this up.

Pull request received. I will update this pull request when review starts.

ClawSweeper review complete

ClawSweeper finished reviewing this revision. The review result is being finalized.

View the workflow run.

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added merge-risk: 🚨 availability 🚨 Merging this PR could cause crashes, hangs, restart loops, stalls, or process outages. P2 Normal priority bug or improvement with limited blast radius. proof: sufficient Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. rating: 🦐 gold shrimp Decent PR readiness signal, but merge confidence is limited. status: ⏳ waiting on author ClawSweeper has contributor-facing work open and is waiting for author action. labels Aug 16, 2026
@clawsweeper

clawsweeper Bot commented Aug 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex review: needs changes before merge. Reviewed September 5, 2026, 9:18 PM ET / September 6, 2026, 01:18 UTC.

ClawSweeper review

What this changes

The PR streams benchmark ID selections from files and HTTP, adds count and byte limits, and updates tests, CLI help, and usage guidance.

Merge readiness

Needs changes before merge - 2 items remain

This PR remains useful: current main and v0.1.7 still buffer entire ID sources. The refreshed runtime evidence addresses the earlier proof request, but the previously reported documentation omission remains.

Priority: P2
Reviewed head: 6baa16f5fe70e10ca1f69925ae1fe25d034a2b9a

Review scores

Measure Result What it means
Overall readiness 🐚 platinum hermit (4/6) A focused, runtime-supported improvement with one remaining documentation correction.
Proof confidence 🦞 diamond lobster (5/6) Sufficient (terminal): The captured current-head macOS CLI transcript exercises the production selection loader, shows all three rejection limits, and shows a 299,600-byte JSONL source reaching downstream row selection; reported HTTP loading supplements that evidence.
Patch quality 🐚 platinum hermit (4/6) 1 actionable review finding remain.

Verification

Check Result Evidence
Real behavior Verified Sufficient (terminal): The captured current-head macOS CLI transcript exercises the production selection loader, shows all three rejection limits, and shows a 299,600-byte JSONL source reaching downstream row selection; reported HTTP loading supplements that evidence.
Evidence reviewed 8 items Repository policy and identity: Read the complete root AGENTS.md and verified the origin repository. No ancestor-scoped AGENTS.md files were found beneath the changed directories; .agents/maintainer-notes is absent. Applied benchmark, documentation, and generated-artifact guidance; did not run the prohibited autoreview helper.
Main and latest release still need streaming: The fetched main revision and v0.1.7 retain io.ReadAll for HTTP and os.ReadFile for local ID sources, followed by parsing. The central change is not implemented there.
Introduced implementation and scope: The complete host-provided merge-base-to-head patch introduces streaming and three selection limits. Source inspection confirms reader closure, unchanged ordering/digest behavior, and validation before benchmark case loading.
Findings 1 actionable finding [P3] Document the per-ID and retained-text limits
Security None None.

How this fits together

ClawScan's benchmark loader reads an ID list before selecting SkillTrustBench cases for scanners and an optional judge. The selection also supplies ordering and provenance metadata for benchmark artifacts.

flowchart LR
  A[File or HTTP ID source] --> B[Stream line parser]
  B --> C[Validate IDs and limits]
  C --> D[Reject invalid selection]
  C --> E[Ordered IDs and digest]
  E --> F[Select benchmark cases]
  F --> G[Scanners and benchmark artifact]
Loading

Before merge

  • Document the per-ID and retained-text limits (P3) - The parser also rejects IDs over 256 bytes and aggregate ID text over 256 KiB, but this paragraph and the CLI skill advertise only the 5,520-ID maximum. Operators cannot determine all acceptance limits from the guidance. Document both byte limits and distinguish them from total streamed source size. This previously reported finding remains unchanged at the reviewed head.
  • Complete next step (P2) - Document both byte limits in the benchmark guide and CLI skill, explicitly distinguishing retained ID text from streamed source size.

Findings

  • [P3] Document the per-ID and retained-text limits — docs/benchmarks.md:14-17
Agent review details

Security

None.

Review metrics

Metric Value Why it matters
Production and test delta Production +34/-10; tests +85/-0; guidance +5/-2 Production growth supports streaming and selection validation, with focused regression coverage.

Technical review

Best possible solution:

Keep the focused streaming implementation and make operator guidance accurately describe all enforced selection limits separately from streamed source size.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Yes, source establishes that current main buffers an entire file or HTTP body before validation; a sufficiently large source can exhaust memory. This review did not execute an exhaustion test.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Yes, streaming through the existing parser is a focused improvement that preserves larger JSONL inputs; the published guidance still needs to match the enforced limits.

Full review comments:

  • [P3] Document the per-ID and retained-text limits — docs/benchmarks.md:14-17
    The parser also rejects IDs over 256 bytes and aggregate ID text over 256 KiB, but this paragraph and the CLI skill advertise only the 5,520-ID maximum. Operators cannot determine all acceptance limits from the guidance. Document both byte limits and distinguish them from total streamed source size. This previously reported finding remains unchanged at the reviewed head.
    Confidence: 0.99

Overall correctness: patch is correct
Overall confidence: 0.9

AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning medium; reviewed against 6432c40f2340.

Labels

Label justifications:

  • P2: This is a bounded benchmark input-handling improvement addressing excessive memory use.
  • rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Overall readiness is 🐚 platinum hermit; proof is 🦞 diamond lobster and patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit.
  • status: 👀 ready for maintainer look: ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. Sufficient (terminal): The captured current-head macOS CLI transcript exercises the production selection loader, shows all three rejection limits, and shows a 299,600-byte JSONL source reaching downstream row selection; reported HTTP loading supplements that evidence.
  • proof: sufficient: Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. The captured current-head macOS CLI transcript exercises the production selection loader, shows all three rejection limits, and shows a 299,600-byte JSONL source reaching downstream row selection; reported HTTP loading supplements that evidence.

Evidence

Acceptance criteria:

  • [P1] make docs-site.
  • [P1] git diff --check.

What I checked:

  • Repository policy and identity: Read the complete root AGENTS.md and verified the origin repository. No ancestor-scoped AGENTS.md files were found beneath the changed directories; .agents/maintainer-notes is absent. Applied benchmark, documentation, and generated-artifact guidance; did not run the prohibited autoreview helper. (AGENTS.md:1, 6baa16f5fe70)
  • Main and latest release still need streaming: The fetched main revision and v0.1.7 retain io.ReadAll for HTTP and os.ReadFile for local ID sources, followed by parsing. The central change is not implemented there. (internal/runner/benchmark.go:332, 6432c40f2340)
  • Introduced implementation and scope: The complete host-provided merge-base-to-head patch introduces streaming and three selection limits. Source inspection confirms reader closure, unchanged ordering/digest behavior, and validation before benchmark case loading. (internal/runner/benchmark.go:322, 6baa16f5fe70)
  • Prior documentation finding remains: The benchmark guide and CLI skill describe only the 5,520-ID cap, while the parser also enforces 256 bytes per ID and 262,144 aggregate ID bytes. Comparison against the previous reviewed SHA shows these files are unchanged. (docs/benchmarks.md:14, 6baa16f5fe70)
  • Current-head runtime evidence: The supplied complete PR body, captured under sourceRevision 9e48e20999e1a3a6abb323d7c593a3de215676819949f99081450d4488a23ddf, records macOS public-CLI runs at the reviewed head rejecting a 257-byte ID, aggregate-byte overflow, and 5,521 IDs. A 299,600-byte JSONL file passes selection and reaches the subsequent missing-row error; HTTP selection reports 400 IDs and a matching digest. The contributor explicitly notes that the full live 5,520-row URL was not exercised. These transcripts address the proof refresh discussed at fix(runner): stream --ids sources and cap selection to the pinned set #47 (comment). (6baa16f5fe70)
  • Related proposal is not a replacement: The provided context identifies fix(runner): cap HTTP --ids response bodies #45 as closed without merging. Its HTTP-only 256-KiB body cap addressed the same buffering problem but did not preserve larger JSONL sources or cover local files.

Likely related people:

  • Patrick Erichsen: Suggested for follow-up; no historical authorship or introduction is verified. (role: unverified routing candidate; confidence: low)
  • SebTardif: Suggested for follow-up; no historical authorship or introduction is verified. (role: unverified routing candidate; confidence: low)

Rank-up moves

Optional improvements that raise the rating; they are not merge blockers.

  • Document the 256-byte per-ID and 256-KiB aggregate ID-text limits in the benchmark guide and CLI skill, distinguishing them from source size.

Rating scale

Score Internal tier Crab rank Meaning
6/6 S 🦀 challenger crab Exceptional readiness
5/6 A 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong readiness
4/6 B 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR; ordinary maintainer review
3/6 C 🦐 gold shrimp Useful, but confidence is limited
2/6 D 🦪 silver shellfish Proof or implementation needs work
1/6 F 🧂 unranked krab Not merge-ready
N/A NA 🌊 off-meta tidepool Rating does not apply

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality.
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

Workflow

  • ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
  • Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
  • A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
  • PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
  • Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
  • Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
  • Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
  • Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

History

Review history (50 earlier review cycles; latest 8 shown)
  • reviewed 2026-08-29T13:59:48.300Z sha 6baa16f :: needs changes before merge. :: [P3] Document every enforced --ids limit
  • reviewed 2026-08-30T22:36:10.622Z sha 6baa16f :: needs changes before merge. :: [P3] Document every enforced --ids limit
  • reviewed 2026-08-31T05:33:23.076Z sha 6baa16f :: needs changes before merge. :: [P3] Document every enforced --ids limit
  • reviewed 2026-08-31T07:58:44.770Z sha 6baa16f :: needs changes before merge. :: [P3] Document the per-ID and retained-text limits
  • reviewed 2026-09-02T19:41:19.588Z sha 6baa16f :: needs changes before merge. :: [P3] Document the per-ID and retained-text limits
  • reviewed 2026-09-03T15:43:06.156Z sha 6baa16f :: needs changes before merge. :: [P3] Document the per-ID and retained-text limits
  • reviewed 2026-09-04T11:53:58.834Z sha 6baa16f :: blocked before merge. :: [P3] Document the per-ID and retained-text limits
  • reviewed 2026-09-05T12:54:44.023Z sha 6baa16f :: needs changes before merge. :: [P3] Document the per-ID and retained-text limits

The 5,520-id cap ran after each extracted id was stored. A hostile
HTTP source could still retain thousands of unique megabyte-sized
ids. Cap one id at 256 bytes and retained id text at 256 KiB. That
still accepts the documented SkillTrustBench set.

Signed-off-by: Sebastien Tardif <sebtardif@ncf.ca>
@SebTardif

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@clawsweeper

[P2] Bound total retained ID bytes
The 5,520-item guard runs after each arbitrary ID has been inserted into both ids and seen; because the scanner permits records up to 1 MiB and IDs only reject whitespace, a hostile HTTP source can still retain several GiB across 5,520 unique records. Add an aggregate byte or ID-length bound that still accepts the documented

Pushed 6baa16f. One extracted id is capped at 256 bytes. Retained id text is capped at 256 KiB. That is not a JSONL file-size limit, so the documented 5,520-id / 1.3 MiB SkillTrustBench stream still parses.

@clawsweeper re-review

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🦪 silver shellfish Thin PR readiness signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work. status: 📣 needs proof The PR needs real behavior proof before ClawSweeper can clear the contributor ask. and removed rating: 🦐 gold shrimp Decent PR readiness signal, but merge confidence is limited. proof: sufficient Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. status: ⏳ waiting on author ClawSweeper has contributor-facing work open and is waiting for author action. merge-risk: 🚨 availability 🚨 Merging this PR could cause crashes, hangs, restart loops, stalls, or process outages. labels Aug 16, 2026
@SebTardif

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@clawsweeper

The PR has useful terminal proof at b501d31, but the final retained-text limits were added in 6baa16f and need a redacted current-head runtime transcript.

Refreshed the PR body with public CLI output from 6baa16f: 256-byte id reject, 262144-byte retained-id reject, 5520-id reject, and a 299600-byte JSONL source that loads then fails on a missing SkillTrustBench row. Also ran make docs-site (Built 7 docs page(s) in dist/docs-site); generated dist/ was not committed.

@clawsweeper re-review

@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added proof: sufficient Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. status: 👀 ready for maintainer look ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. merge-risk: 🚨 availability 🚨 Merging this PR could cause crashes, hangs, restart loops, stalls, or process outages. and removed status: 📣 needs proof The PR needs real behavior proof before ClawSweeper can clear the contributor ask. rating: 🦪 silver shellfish Thin PR readiness signal; proof, validation, or implementation needs work. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. labels Aug 16, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. merge-risk: 🚨 compatibility 🚨 Merging this PR could break existing users, config, migrations, defaults, or upgrades. rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. status: needs maintainer proof decision A ClawSweeper-authored PR needs a maintainer proof capture or override decision. status: 👀 ready for maintainer look ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. and removed rating: 🦞 diamond lobster Very strong PR readiness with only minor maintainer review expected. merge-risk: 🚨 availability 🚨 Merging this PR could cause crashes, hangs, restart loops, stalls, or process outages. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. status: 👀 ready for maintainer look ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. merge-risk: 🚨 compatibility 🚨 Merging this PR could break existing users, config, migrations, defaults, or upgrades. status: needs maintainer proof decision A ClawSweeper-authored PR needs a maintainer proof capture or override decision. labels Aug 23, 2026
@clawsweeper clawsweeper Bot added merge-risk: 🚨 compatibility 🚨 Merging this PR could break existing users, config, migrations, defaults, or upgrades. rating: 🦐 gold shrimp Decent PR readiness signal, but merge confidence is limited. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. and removed merge-risk: 🚨 compatibility 🚨 Merging this PR could break existing users, config, migrations, defaults, or upgrades. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. rating: 🦐 gold shrimp Decent PR readiness signal, but merge confidence is limited. labels Aug 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

P2 Normal priority bug or improvement with limited blast radius. proof: sufficient Contributor real behavior proof is sufficient. rating: 🐚 platinum hermit Good normal PR readiness with ordinary maintainer review expected. status: 👀 ready for maintainer look ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant