Skip to content

Clarify the non-blocking check failure note - #189

Merged
trask merged 2 commits into
open-telemetry:mainfrom
trask:clarify-non-blocking-check-note
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

Clarify the non-blocking check failure note#189
trask merged 2 commits into
open-telemetry:mainfrom
trask:clarify-non-blocking-check-note

Conversation

@trask

@trask trask commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The note reading Investigate required status check failures. Note: codecov/patch is failing but is not a required check. scanned as a contradiction, since nothing tied the second sentence back to the first. It now says "is also failing", which makes it read as an aside about an additional failure.

On non-author routes the same text was rendered standalone under a **Non-blocking check failure:** label, where "also" would dangle and the rest of the sentence just restated the label, so that case now lists the check names only.

@opentelemetry-pr-dashboard

opentelemetry-pr-dashboard Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pull request dashboard status

Merged · refreshed 2026-07-30 12:40 UTC

Status above doesn't look right?
  • Anything look wrong? Report it with what you expected; it helps us improve the dashboard.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Clarifies non-blocking check failure messaging across dashboard routes.

Changes:

  • Adds “also” when non-blocking failures accompany required failures.
  • Shows only check names on non-author routes.
  • Updates related tests, though some assertions remain too permissive.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
.github/scripts/pull-request-dashboard/pr_status_comment.py Adds context-specific failure summaries.
.github/scripts/pull-request-dashboard/test_pr_status_comment.py Updates expected status messages.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/scripts/pull-request-dashboard/test_pr_status_comment.py:346

  • These expected values are still prefixes of the old verbose lines, and the later assertIn therefore passes without the production change. Add line boundaries so both parameterized cases actually verify that the redundant suffix was removed.
                "**Non-blocking check failure:** CodeQL",

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread .github/scripts/pull-request-dashboard/test_pr_status_comment.py

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

@trask
trask marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2026 19:25
@trask
trask requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2026 19:25
@trask
trask requested a review from maryliag July 29, 2026 19:25
@trask
trask merged commit b560e41 into open-telemetry:main Jul 30, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants