Skip to content

Updated Multi-Team Functionality Clarification#9027

Open
CooperWang0912 wants to merge 2 commits into
mattermost:masterfrom
CooperWang0912:CooperWang0912-patch-1
Open

Updated Multi-Team Functionality Clarification#9027
CooperWang0912 wants to merge 2 commits into
mattermost:masterfrom
CooperWang0912:CooperWang0912-patch-1

Conversation

@CooperWang0912

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sumary

The original description that "We don’t yet support search or channels across teams, which can impact the cross-team user experience. This includes general searches, saved posts, and recent mentions." is no longer accurate. Therefore the description is removed to avoid confusion.

Details

Clarify deployment recommendations for Mattermost regarding single and multiple teams.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 12, 2026 07:39

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Updates the end-user documentation for organizing using teams by removing an outdated limitation and adjusting note formatting.

Changes:

  • Removed a bullet stating cross-team search and channels aren’t supported.
  • Adjusted indentation/formatting in a note about archived teams and API accessibility.

Comment thread source/end-user-guide/collaborate/organize-using-teams.rst
Comment on lines 118 to +120
.. note::

Archiving a team doesn't remove the team data from the Mattermost database. Teams may still be accessible by using the Mattermost API. No newline at end of file
Archiving a team doesn't remove the team data from the Mattermost database. Teams may still be accessible by using the Mattermost API.
@mattermost-build

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @CooperWang0912,

Thanks for your pull request! A Core Committer will review your pull request soon. For code contributions, you can learn more about the review process here.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f02b8199-d2ff-4f4b-9a23-1030bf43d816

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 925974c and cb1f297.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/end-user-guide/collaborate/organize-using-teams.rst

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates a single documentation file to remove an outdated bullet claiming cross-team search/channels were unsupported, adds a bullet confirming multi-team search features (general search, saved posts, recent mentions), reorders the integrations persistence item, and applies a whitespace-only edit to the team-archiving note.

Changes

Team organization guidance updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Single-team deployment guidance and archiving note
source/end-user-guide/collaborate/organize-using-teams.rst
Removed bullet claiming cross-team search/channels (general search, saved posts, recent mentions) were unsupported; added bullet stating those search/features are supported across teams; moved integrations persistence bullet after communication; applied whitespace-only change to the Archiving a team note.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main change—updating documentation to clarify that multi-team functionality is now supported, removing outdated limitations.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining why an outdated statement was removed and providing references to confirm that cross-team search, saved posts, and recent mentions are now supported.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Added information about platform support for multiple team functionalities.
@CooperWang0912 CooperWang0912 requested a review from Copilot June 12, 2026 08:36

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Comment on lines 119 to +121
.. note::

Archiving a team doesn't remove the team data from the Mattermost database. Teams may still be accessible by using the Mattermost API. No newline at end of file
Archiving a team doesn't remove the team data from the Mattermost database. Teams may still be accessible by using the Mattermost API.
Comment thread source/end-user-guide/collaborate/organize-using-teams.rst
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants