Skip to content

introduce a generic closed_under definition #1871

Description

@affeldt-aist

as explained in the following comment by @t6s

#1868 (review)

and completed by the notation proposed by @CohenCyril in this other comment

#1868 (comment)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    renaming/refactoring 🔧This is about a renaming or refactoring in the library

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions