Skip to content

Document competitor compatibility and implementation roadmap#4

Open
konard wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
issue-3-76fd8551a425
Open

Document competitor compatibility and implementation roadmap#4
konard wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
issue-3-76fd8551a425

Conversation

@konard

@konard konard commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • add an auditable Redis, Memcached, and Dragonfly compatibility matrix
  • distinguish semantic compatibility from client API and wire-protocol compatibility
  • inventory current support and gaps across cache operations, data structures, persistence, scaling, operations, and protocols
  • define six independently testable implementation phases, with explicit requirements for storage-mode and protocol conformance tests
  • link the matrix from the package README and include it in the existing release changeset

Scope

Redis, Memcached, and Dragonfly are network services, while lino-cache is currently an embedded file-backed cache-manager store. The matrix avoids claiming drop-in or wire compatibility where none exists and establishes the checklist required to implement and verify competitor features incrementally.

References used:

Verification

  • npm test — 30 tests passed
  • npm run check — ESLint, Prettier, and duplication checks passed
  • node scripts/validate-changeset.mjs — passed

Fixes #3

Adding .gitkeep for PR creation (default mode).
This file will be removed when the task is complete.

Issue: #3
@konard konard self-assigned this Jul 12, 2026
@konard konard changed the title [WIP] We need to make sure we implement all the features of competitors using our associative stack Document competitor compatibility and implementation roadmap Jul 12, 2026
@konard
konard marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2026 03:22
@konard

konard commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Working session summary

Implemented and finalized PR #4.

Key changes:

  • Added a Redis, Memcached, and Dragonfly compatibility matrix.
  • Distinguished semantic, client API, and wire-protocol compatibility.
  • Documented current gaps and a six-phase implementation roadmap.
  • Linked the matrix from the README.
  • Updated the release changeset.
  • Marked the PR ready for review.

Verification:

  • 30 local tests passed.
  • Lint, Prettier, duplication, and changeset validation passed.
  • Full CI passed across Node.js, Bun, and Deno on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
  • Working tree is clean.

This summary was automatically extracted from the AI working session output.

@konard

konard commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

🤖 Solution Draft Log

This log file contains the complete execution trace of the AI solution draft process.

💰 Cost estimation:

  • Model: GPT-5.6 Sol
  • Provider: OpenAI
  • Public pricing estimate: $2.467523

📊 Context and tokens usage:

  • 68.1K / 200K (34%) input tokens, 7.8K / 128K (6%) output tokens

Total: (68.1K + 1.4M cached) input tokens, 7.8K output tokens, $2.467523 cost

🤖 Models used:

  • Tool: OpenAI Codex
  • Requested: gpt-5.6-sol
  • Thinking level: medium (~15999 tokens)
  • Model: GPT-5.6 Sol (gpt-5.6-sol)

📎 Log file uploaded as Gist (1069KB)


Now working session is ended, feel free to review and add any feedback on the solution draft.

@konard

konard commented Jul 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

✅ Ready to merge

This pull request is now ready to be merged:

  • All CI checks have passed
  • No merge conflicts
  • No pending changes

Monitored by hive-mind with --auto-restart-until-mergeable flag

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

We need to make sure we implement all the features of competitors using our associative stack

1 participant