[PROPOSAL] Improve reverse-elab structural proof peeling - #12
Open
ppotapov-aws wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[PROPOSAL] Improve reverse-elab structural proof peeling#12ppotapov-aws wants to merge 1 commit into
ppotapov-aws wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Improve reverse-elab structural proof peeling Add bounded peeling for proof-valued application arguments so reverse-elab can emit structured `refine ... ?_` scripts instead of falling back to opaque `exact` terms. Handle cheap administrative wrappers and `funext` explicitly, and keep closer-assisted structural candidates separately budgeted while reporting them as structural proofs. Mirror the reverse-elab changes in worker plugins and add regression coverage for nested proof applications, funext, and Eq.mpr-wrapped cases.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add bounded peeling for proof-valued application arguments so reverse-elab can emit structured
refine ... ?_scripts instead of falling back to opaqueexactterms. Handle cheap administrative wrappers andfunextexplicitly, and keep closer-assisted structural candidates separately budgeted while reporting them as structural proofs.Mirror the reverse-elab changes in worker plugins and add regression coverage for nested proof applications, funext, and Eq.mpr-wrapped cases.