Skip to content

Size mismatch feedback - #19

Merged
m-messer merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
size-mismatch-feedback
Nov 4, 2026
Merged

m-messer merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
size-mismatch-feedback

Conversation

@peterbjohnson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Checks the size of the response before checking the content.

Needs significant testing before deploying to PROD

peterbjohnson and others added 5 commits October 29, 2026 13:29
Check the response shape against the answer before grading. Mismatches
(too many/few entries, wrong nesting) now return is_correct False with
feedback describing the difference, rather than raising an exception or
an IndexError. Also fixes short responses being graded on a subset of
the answer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mock the symbolicEqual client at import so the tests run without AWS
credentials, and check mismatches are reported without grading cells.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Patch the client per test instead, so the tests work whether or not
credentials are present and never replace a real client module-wide.
Note in the readme that the healthcheck doesn't run evaluation_test.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Test size feedback through evaluation_function only, and remove the
now-redundant shape_test.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@m-messer

m-messer commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Tested against 500 database entries: https://github.com/lambda-feedback/ArraySymbolicEqual/actions/runs/41445216519

One error, which is the same as main.

Comment thread app/evaluation.py Resolved
Comment thread app/shape.py Resolved
Comment thread app/shape.py Resolved
Comment thread app/shape.py Resolved
@m-messer
m-messer merged commit fd4391d into master Nov 4, 2026
1 check passed
@m-messer
m-messer deleted the size-mismatch-feedback branch November 4, 2026 10:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants