#1127 Clear up Server Command Line options

[pljones]

Short description of changes
As per #1127, the Release Process referred to a non-existent document that should be checked.

This change:

• Creates (restores?) that document
• Updates the Release Process also to mention the separate Shared command line options file
• Removes the unused Command-Line-Options.md file
• Turns all the options lists into markdown tables
• Adjusts Running-a-Server references for slightly improved consistency
  • Separately, we could do with cleaning this page up...
• Adjusts Server-Troubleshooting references for slightly improved consistency
• Adjusts Software-Manual a heading and mentions the server options are elsewhere

Context: Fixes an issue? Related issues

Fixes 1127

Status of this Pull Request

I think it's working - not sure about the linkcheck errors (not in English):

$ docker run -e LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 --network host --rm tennox/linkcheck http://localhost:9800/ > linkcheck.log
$ cat linkcheck.log
Crawling...

http://localhost:9800/wiki/Command-Line-Options
- (445:0) 'Consejos..' => http://localhost:9800/wiki/Tips-Tricks-More#utilizar---ctrlmidich-para-controladores-midi (HTTP 200 but missing anchor)
- (452:9) 'Ejecutar..' => http://localhost:9800/wiki/Running-a-Server#opciones-relacionadas-con-el-modo-servidor (HTTP 200 but missing anchor)


Stats:
    3354 links
      72 destination URLs
     787 URLs ignored
       2 warnings
       0 errors

What is missing until this pull request can be merged?

Style review, someone to double-check it makes sense still.

Does this need translation?

Yes. NOTE Links have changed.

Checklist

• I've verified that this Pull Request follows the general code principles
• I waited some time after this Pull Request was opened and all GitHub checks completed without errors.
• I'm sure that this Pull Request goes to the correct branch

[pljones]

@ann0see @dingodoppelt @softins @ignotus666
@gilgongo if you're not around, could someone please confirm we can go ahead with website changes with someone else's approval?

[gilgongo]

@ann0see @dingodoppelt @softins @ignotus666 @gilgongo if you're not around, could someone please confirm we can go ahead with website changes with someone else's approval?

Fine by me. Do I need to do anything?

[pljones]

@ann0see @dingodoppelt @softins @ignotus666 @gilgongo if you're not around, could someone please confirm we can go ahead with website changes with someone else's approval?

Fine by me. Do I need to do anything?

Review and approve.

Although at the moment getting GitHub Actions job jekyll_site_ci working is probably more important. I'm trying to get CoPilot to take a look.

[ann0see]

I'm unsure what happens and why. So I'd rather not approve this without knowing the back story.

[pljones]

I'm unsure what happens and why. So I'd rather not approve this without knowing the back story.

Could you explain what you're missing?

[ann0see]

I am not sure what the back story of this file is.

[pljones]

It's explained in #1127