Prefer default member initializers also for non-constant initializers - #2333
Open
N-Dekker wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Removed the restriction "for constant initializers" from guideline C.48, "Prefer default member initializers to member initializers in constructors..." The restriction appears unnecessary, as discussed by issue isocpp#2332
N-Dekker
force-pushed
the
C-48-Prefer-default-member-initializers-also-for-non-constant
branch
from
August 7, 2026 10:14
80f99ab to
e415f5b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removed the restriction "for constant initializers" from guideline C.48, Prefer default member initializers to member initializers in constructors for constant initializers
now()) as default member initializer, which also appears preferable: