fix(ci): restore reachable standards workflow pins - #31
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Team Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (20)
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Update reusable workflow revisions .github/workflows/governance.yml, .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml, .github/workflows/scorecard.yml |
The three workflows now use the newer pinned revision 092dedada188f56c5915f74a5fd40aac093742c3. |
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 50bee
The workflow callers now use the reachable pinned standards revision, restoring reusable workflow execution without changing caller permissions or workflow structure. The change is ready to merge.
Poem
A rabbit checks the workflow trail
New pins march in a tidy line
Governance hops ahead
Hypatia scans with care
Scorecards guard the burrow fine
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check | The description explains the change, cause, impact, and intended outcome, but it does not follow the repository template. It omits the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Sc… | Rewrite the description using the repository template. Add the required headings, list the workflow pin changes, complete the applicable checklist items, describe testing or state that no tests were required, and include screenshots or term… |
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title clearly identifies the CI change: restoring reachable pins for the standards reusable workflows. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… |
| Linked Issues check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
Full details: Description check
Explanation
The description explains the change, cause, impact, and intended outcome, but it does not follow the repository template. It omits the required Summary, Changes, RSR Quality Checklist, Testing, and Screenshots sections.
Resolution
Rewrite the description using the repository template. Add the required headings, list the workflow pin changes, complete the applicable checklist items, describe testing or state that no tests were required, and include screenshots or terminal output when applicable.
- Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
- Create stacked PR
- Commit on current branch
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
|



Replace the unreachable standards reusable-workflow commit 7fdc2705df74b4e352d2a1cde3e87a5923fdf329 with reachable standards main commit 092dedada188f56c5915f74a5fd40aac093742c3. The old SHA is an intermediate commit from squash-merged standards PR #596: it exists, but GitHub rejects it for cross-repository reusable workflows before creating jobs. This restores Hypatia/SARIF and the other affected workflows without weakening SHA pinning or branch protection. Estate incident: 251 active workflow files across 70 repositories in hyperpolymath and metadatastician.