fix(ci): pin standards reusables to default-branch HEAD - #90
Conversation
This repo's standards reusable pins are re-pointed at the standards default-branch HEAD, resolved live at sweep time. The prior refs are recorded in the verification line below. Three kinds of drift are repaired together and the body does not claim which one this repo had: an UNREACHABLE sha kills the run at workflow STARTUP, so GitHub reports no check at all rather than a failing one and the gate disappears instead of going red; a FLOATING ref (@main) is unpinned supply chain; a merely STALE but reachable sha silently reintroduces every bug fixed since it. files=5 pins=5 perms=0 permlines=0 from=fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2 target=257869d3 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0178nN4Nm3neFRy5K9StZKnB
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details
|
| Layer / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
Update reusable workflow revisions .github/workflows/governance.yml, .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml, .github/workflows/mirror.yml, .github/workflows/scorecard.yml, .github/workflows/secret-scanner.yml |
The five workflow references now use commit 257869d3061d5a8ed1529bf34225d90a2416d51a instead of the previous pinned revision. |
Priority: ⬇️ Low
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 71af9
This updates five reusable GitHub Actions workflow references to a newer immutable standards revision without changing permissions or scheduling. The updated references remain compatible, so no merge-blocking risk is identified.
Suggested reviewers: metadatastician
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
| Check name | Status | Explanation | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description check | The description clearly explains the five workflow pin updates, the previous and target revisions, and the reason for the change. However, it omits most required template sections, including Type of C… | Rewrite the description using the repository template. Complete the required sections, mark the configuration/infrastructure change, list the five workflow updates, record testing and test results, complete applicable checklist items, and p… |
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title accurately and concisely describes the main change: pinning the standards reusable workflows to the default-branch HEAD. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0… |
| Linked Issues check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
| Out of Scope Changes check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request. |
Full details: Description check
Explanation
The description clearly explains the five workflow pin updates, the previous and target revisions, and the reason for the change. However, it omits most required template sections, including Type of Change, Related Issues, Changes Made, Testing, Checklist, Additional Context, and Reviewer Notes.
Resolution
Rewrite the description using the repository template. Complete the required sections, mark the configuration/infrastructure change, list the five workflow updates, record testing and test results, complete applicable checklist items, and provide issue links or state that none apply.
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
- Create stacked PR
- Commit on current branch
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
A rabbit checked each workflow pin
And found the newer commit within
Governance hopped, scans followed too
Mirrors and Scorecard changed their view
Secret scanning now joins the crew
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.
Re-points this repo's
hyperpolymath/standardsreusable-workflow pins at the standards default-branch HEAD,257869d3061d5a8ed1529bf34225d90a2416d51a.Why this is not a routine version bump.
uses: org/repo/.github/workflows/x.yml@<ref>is resolved at workflow startup, so a bad ref is not a failing job — it is no job at all. This campaign repairs three kinds of drift and does not assume which one this repo had:gh pr checkssimply lists fewer rows. A repo in this state looks greener than one with working gates;@mainruns, but unpinned — the supply-chain property the estate pins for is absent;The refs this repo was actually pinned to, before this PR:
fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2.Expect this PR to surface failures that main does not show. Those failures are revealed, not introduced — they are the gates resuming work after being silently absent. The honest comparison is the set of check names emitted here versus on
main, not pass/fail counts. On the canary (hyperpolymath/empty-linter#79) the governance suite was absent on main and emitted 25 checks once repaired.The target is default-branch HEAD resolved at sweep time, never a sha copied from a plan: a reachable but non-HEAD sha silently reintroduces every bug fixed since it.
Engine:
.git-private-farm/scripts/smtp-notify-sweep.sh --campaign campaigns/pin-repair.sh. Verification for this repo:files=5 pins=5 perms=0 permlines=0 from=fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2 target=257869d3 sig=G 71af918 canon=393d9db5fa79 base=main🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_0178nN4Nm3neFRy5K9StZKnB