Skip to content

docs: add CI pipeline receipt example#8

Open
hummbl-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/codex/issue-5-ci-receipt-example
Open

docs: add CI pipeline receipt example#8
hummbl-dev wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/codex/issue-5-ci-receipt-example

Conversation

@hummbl-dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Add a CI pipeline execution receipt worked example.
  • Include command, inputs, outputs, environment fingerprint, exit status, and verification chain.
  • Keep the example candidate/non-canon.

Validation

  • git diff --check passed.

Refs #5

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a707084b-beeb-4d77-91c1-a7b180e6afab

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a5e025 and 5495b1a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/ci-pipeline-receipt-worked-example.md

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a worked example showing a CI pipeline execution receipt in a clear Markdown format.
    • Includes a sample receipt packet with command details, inputs/outputs, environment fingerprinting, exit status, and verification chain.
    • Provides a short summary of what the example covers for easier reference.

Walkthrough

Adds a new documentation file, examples/ci-pipeline-receipt-worked-example.md, containing a worked example of a CI pipeline execution receipt packet in JSON format, with fields for authority, command, inputs/outputs, environment fingerprint, exit status, verification chain, and a summary bullet list.

Changes

Worked Example Documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Receipt packet worked example
examples/ci-pipeline-receipt-worked-example.md
New Markdown doc presents a scenario description and a JSON-shaped receipt packet example (authority, command, inputs/outputs with digests, environment fingerprint, exit status, verification chain), followed by a bullet list summarizing scope and clarifying it does not change operator-authority surfaces or introduce new terminology.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related issues

Poem

A rabbit hops through logs and lines,
Stamping receipts with digest signs,
No powers changed, just words made clear,
A worked example, crisp and dear.
🐇📄✨ Hop on, review is near!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the change: a new documentation example for CI pipeline receipts.
Description check ✅ Passed The description accurately summarizes the added receipt example and its validation note.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/codex/issue-5-ci-receipt-example

Warning

Tools execution failed with the following error:

Failed to run tools: 13 INTERNAL: Received RST_STREAM with code 2 (Internal server error)


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hummbl-dev hummbl-dev marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2026 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant