Skip to content

devops: drop self-hosted Gemini review workflow; pin CI runners - #32

Merged
saucam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
devops/oss-ci-standards
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

devops: drop self-hosted Gemini review workflow; pin CI runners#32
saucam merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
devops/oss-ci-standards

Conversation

@saucam

@saucam saucam commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Removes the self-hosted gemini-review.yml — AI review is now the org-level highflame-oracle + gemini-code-assist apps (+ Socket Security), matching the other Highflame repos. Pins CI runners to ubuntu-24.04. Keeps the OSS-native pipeline (npm-OIDC / crates release-plz); deliberately does NOT adopt the private k8s shared workflow (a public repo cannot consume private reusable workflows or the internal self-hosted runners).

⚠️ Org-admin follow-up: add these repos to the highflame-oracle + gemini-code-assist app repo access.

(Supersedes the earlier PR, which GitHub left in a stuck state — CI events never dispatched.)

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

AI review is now the org-level highflame-oracle + gemini-code-assist apps
(+ Socket Security), matching the other Highflame repos, so the self-hosted
`gemini-review.yml` is redundant. Removed.

Pins the CI + release-plz runners to `ubuntu-24.04`. The native-binary build
matrix in release.yml is left on `ubuntu-latest` on purpose — bumping the linux
builder would raise the glibc floor of the published `codeoid-tui` binary.

Keeps the OSS-native Rust pipeline (fmt/clippy/nextest+llvm-cov, release-plz +
crates.io). Deliberately not adopting the private k8s shared workflow.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

@saucam saucam closed this Jul 23, 2026
@saucam saucam reopened this Jul 23, 2026
@saucam
saucam merged commit 4cb1283 into main Jul 23, 2026
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants