Skip to content

Wave 8.1: A4Bridge.v — a4 bridge analysis, Boundary Theorem BT-8 - #47

Open
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
wave8/w8.1-a4-bridge
Open

Wave 8.1: A4Bridge.v — a4 bridge analysis, Boundary Theorem BT-8#47
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
wave8/w8.1-a4-bridge

Conversation

@gHashTag

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Adds proofs/trinity/A4Bridge.v establishing Boundary Theorem BT-8: the conversion factor between the two competing a_4 definitions cannot be identified with any exact H4/600-cell integer invariant.

Background

The a_4 gap problem (documented in lagrangian_roadmap.md §APPENDIX B, HARSH_REVIEW_v49.md §4, FINAL_STATUS_v44.md) asks:

  • Coq_a4 = (5+6*phi)/(16*phi) ≈ 0.568 (heat kernel, SpectralAction600Cell.v)
  • Trinity_a4 = 8*phi^3 ≈ 33.889 (H4 invariant fit, HiggsPrediction.v)
  • Ratio k ≈ 59.649 — can this be identified with an H4 integer invariant?

A4Conversion.v already proves the algebraic identity Trinity_a4 = k * Coq_a4. This PR answers the geometric question negatively (BT-8).

Numerical Analysis (bc, scale=20)

phi = (1+sqrt(5))/2 ≈ 1.61803398874989484820
Coq_a4  = (5+6*phi)/(16*phi)     ≈ 0.56813562148434214006
Trinity_a4 = 8*phi^3              ≈ 33.88854381999831757096
k_ratio = 128*phi^4/(5+6*phi)    ≈ 59.64868693052419061620

Rationalized: k = (704 + 192*sqrt(5)) / 19

H4 candidates:
  h(H4) = 30         k/30  = 1.988  -- not 30
  2*h   = 60         60-k  = 0.351  -- not 60 (closest integer)
  sum exponents = 60 (1+11+19+29)   -- not 60
  cells_600/10 = 60                  -- not 60
  edges_600/12 = 60                  -- not 60
  vertices_600 = 120                 -- k < 60 < 120

Proof Structure

  • k_ratio_gt_59 / k_ratio_lt_60: interval arithmetic (i_prec 30)
  • a4_algebraic_bridge: Trinity_a4 = k_ratio * Coq_a4 (field tactic)
  • k_ratio_rationalized: k = (704+192*sqrt5)/19 (mirrors A4Conversion.v)
  • BT8_no_H4_integer_bridge: main conjunction theorem

Outcome

Boundary Theorem BT-8: No exact H4-integer bridge exists.
The conversion factor k = (704+192*sqrt5)/19 is irrational (element of Q(sqrt5) \ Q).
The ~0.59% deviation from 60 is a genuine mathematical boundary of the H4 framework.

BT-8 joins BT-1..BT-4 (BoundaryTheorems.v) as a Coq-formal impossibility result.

Files Changed

  • proofs/trinity/A4Bridge.v (new, 370 lines)
  • proofs/trinity/_CoqProject (add A4Bridge.v entry)

R1 Compliance

No Python files. No .py added. All code in English.

Adds proofs/trinity/A4Bridge.v establishing Boundary Theorem BT-8:
the a_4 conversion factor k = 128*phi^4/(5+6*phi) = (704+192*sqrt5)/19
is irrational and equals no exact H4/600-cell integer invariant.

Numerical analysis (bc, scale=20):
  Coq_a4    = (5+6*phi)/(16*phi)  ≈ 0.56814
  Trinity_a4 = 8*phi^3             ≈ 33.8885
  k_ratio   = Trinity_a4/Coq_a4  ≈ 59.6487

Candidates tested and ruled out (all by interval arithmetic, 59 < k < 60):
  h(H4) = 30                  -- k > 59
  2*h(H4) = 60                -- k < 60
  sum of exponents = 60       -- k < 60
  cells_600/10 = 60           -- k < 60
  edges_600/12 = 60           -- k < 60
  vertices_600 = 120          -- k < 60

Algebraic bridge: Trinity_a4 = k_ratio * Coq_a4 (field tactic)
Rationalized: k = (704+192*sqrt5)/19 in Q(sqrt5) \ Q

BT-8 joins BT-1..BT-4 (BoundaryTheorems.v) as a Coq-formal result.
Also adds A4Bridge.v to proofs/trinity/_CoqProject.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant