Wave 8.1: A4Bridge.v — a4 bridge analysis, Boundary Theorem BT-8 - #47
Open
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Wave 8.1: A4Bridge.v — a4 bridge analysis, Boundary Theorem BT-8#47gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Adds proofs/trinity/A4Bridge.v establishing Boundary Theorem BT-8: the a_4 conversion factor k = 128*phi^4/(5+6*phi) = (704+192*sqrt5)/19 is irrational and equals no exact H4/600-cell integer invariant. Numerical analysis (bc, scale=20): Coq_a4 = (5+6*phi)/(16*phi) ≈ 0.56814 Trinity_a4 = 8*phi^3 ≈ 33.8885 k_ratio = Trinity_a4/Coq_a4 ≈ 59.6487 Candidates tested and ruled out (all by interval arithmetic, 59 < k < 60): h(H4) = 30 -- k > 59 2*h(H4) = 60 -- k < 60 sum of exponents = 60 -- k < 60 cells_600/10 = 60 -- k < 60 edges_600/12 = 60 -- k < 60 vertices_600 = 120 -- k < 60 Algebraic bridge: Trinity_a4 = k_ratio * Coq_a4 (field tactic) Rationalized: k = (704+192*sqrt5)/19 in Q(sqrt5) \ Q BT-8 joins BT-1..BT-4 (BoundaryTheorems.v) as a Coq-formal result. Also adds A4Bridge.v to proofs/trinity/_CoqProject.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds
proofs/trinity/A4Bridge.vestablishing Boundary Theorem BT-8: the conversion factor between the two competinga_4definitions cannot be identified with any exact H4/600-cell integer invariant.Background
The
a_4gap problem (documented inlagrangian_roadmap.md§APPENDIX B,HARSH_REVIEW_v49.md§4,FINAL_STATUS_v44.md) asks:Coq_a4 = (5+6*phi)/(16*phi) ≈ 0.568(heat kernel,SpectralAction600Cell.v)Trinity_a4 = 8*phi^3 ≈ 33.889(H4 invariant fit,HiggsPrediction.v)k ≈ 59.649— can this be identified with an H4 integer invariant?A4Conversion.valready proves the algebraic identityTrinity_a4 = k * Coq_a4. This PR answers the geometric question negatively (BT-8).Numerical Analysis (bc, scale=20)
Proof Structure
k_ratio_gt_59/k_ratio_lt_60: interval arithmetic (i_prec 30)a4_algebraic_bridge:Trinity_a4 = k_ratio * Coq_a4(field tactic)k_ratio_rationalized:k = (704+192*sqrt5)/19(mirrorsA4Conversion.v)BT8_no_H4_integer_bridge: main conjunction theoremOutcome
Boundary Theorem BT-8: No exact H4-integer bridge exists.
The conversion factor
k = (704+192*sqrt5)/19is irrational (element ofQ(sqrt5) \ Q).The ~0.59% deviation from 60 is a genuine mathematical boundary of the H4 framework.
BT-8 joins BT-1..BT-4 (
BoundaryTheorems.v) as a Coq-formal impossibility result.Files Changed
proofs/trinity/A4Bridge.v(new, 370 lines)proofs/trinity/_CoqProject(add A4Bridge.v entry)R1 Compliance
No Python files. No
.pyadded. All code in English.