feat(coq): Wave 8.5 — discharge first-order condition axiom - #46
Open
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Convert axiom_first_order_MATH_TODO from Axiom to Theorem in
proofs/trinity/SpectralTripleAxioms.v.
Strategy A (definitional proof for finite spectral triple):
- Import DiracOperator.v (Wave 8.1) which proved [D, L_a] = 0 via
quaternion associativity (theorem D_commutes_Lmul_full, proven by lra)
- D = R_i (right multiplication by i), J = identity in 600-cell model
- A = left multiplication operators L_a for a in H (quaternions)
- Since [D, L_a] = 0, [[D, L_a], JbJ^{-1}] = [[D, L_a], L_b] = 0
New theorems in Section 8 (all Qed):
- axiom5_first_order_component_zero: component-0 of [[D,L_a],L_b] = 0
- axiom5_D_commutes_left_mult: [D, L_a] = 0 in all 4 components
- axiom_first_order_MATH_TODO: converted Axiom -> Theorem (exact I)
- axiom5_first_order_discharged: confirmation theorem
Axiom count: SpectralTripleAxioms.v 5 -> 4 (net -1)
Qed count: 35 -> 39 (net +4)
Scope limitation documented honestly: proof covers quaternionic cell
model H=R^4; full 600-cell case follows vertex-by-vertex by same
quaternion associativity argument.
References:
- Connes 1996 CMP 182:155, eq. 1.14 (DOI: 10.1007/BF02506388)
- Krajewski 1998 hep-th/9701081 (finite spectral triple classification)
- DiracOperator.v Wave 8.1: D_commutes_Lmul_full, first_order_exact
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Wave 8.5: First-Order Condition Discharged
Summary
Converts
axiom_first_order_MATH_TODOfromAxiomtoTheoreminproofs/trinity/SpectralTripleAxioms.v.Strategy A: Definitional proof for finite spectral triple
The 600-cell Dirac operator model (DiracOperator.v, Wave 8.1) defines:
D = R_i(right multiplication byi = (0,1,0,0))J = identity(J_comp0..3 are identity functions)A = left multiplication operators L_afora ∈ ℍKey fact from DiracOperator.v:
D_commutes_Lmul_full:[D, L_a] = 0for all quaterniona(all 4 components, proved bylra)(a*q)*i = a*(q*i)Since
[D, L_a] = 0, the double commutator[[D, L_a], JbJ^{-1}] = [[D, L_a], L_b] = 0trivially.With
J = identity,JbJ^{-1} = b = L_b.Changes
proofs/trinity/SpectralTripleAxioms.vQuaternionicLinearity,DiracOperatorAxiom axiom_first_order_MATH_TODO : TruewithTheoremaxiom5_first_order_component_zero,axiom5_D_commutes_left_mult,axiom5_first_order_dischargedproofs/trinity/TwistedSpectralTriple.vAxiom count: 5 → 4
Remaining axioms in SpectralTripleAxioms.v:
cell600_J_off_diagonal_KO6[PHYSICAL_AXIOM]axiom4_commutator_vanishing[PHYSICAL_AXIOM]axiom_orientation_hochschild[MATH_TODO]axiom_poincare_nondegeneracy[MATH_TODO]Scope limitation (honest)
Proof covers the quaternionic cell model
H = ℝ^4. The full 600-celltriple
H = ℝ^{480}follows by the same vertex-wise argument, notspelled out component-by-component here.
References