Skip to content

docs: mark three archived issue bodies as superseded on hardware status - #91

Open
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
archive-staleness-banners
Open

docs: mark three archived issue bodies as superseded on hardware status#91
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
archive-staleness-banners

Conversation

@gHashTag

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Three archived issue bodies state that the crypto core has never run on real hardware and that gHashTag/trios-mesh does not exist. Both were true when written; neither is true now.

  • smoke/M1_RESULTS.md records two on-device runs with RC=0 and distinct binary hashes, 2026-07-01 (P201Mini) and 2026-07-04 (board-1).
  • gHashTag/trios-mesh exists.

Today a reader who greps this repository finds the archive and the status table asserting opposite things, with nothing indicating which is current. That contradiction is the kind an external reviewer finds quickly and cannot resolve on their own.

Files touched: docs/issues-archive/bodies/{tri-net-skill,p2-shared-uplink,p2-self-heal}.md. A banner is prepended to each; no body text is edited, so the record of what was believed at the time stays intact.

On p2-self-heal the banner also states what still holds unchanged: the M5 convergence threshold is undefined and no self-healing re-route has been observed on hardware. That part of the file was not stale and is marked as still current.

Found while verifying claims in gHashTag/golden-chain-international against live artefacts.

The three files state that the crypto core has never run on real hardware and
that gHashTag/trios-mesh does not exist. Both were true when the issues were
written and neither is true now: smoke/M1_RESULTS.md records two on-device runs
with RC=0 and distinct binary hashes, dated 2026-07-01 and 2026-07-04, and the
repository exists.

An external reader who greps this repository currently finds the archived text
and the status table asserting opposite things, with nothing to say which is
current. Banners are added at the top of each file; the body text is left
unedited so the record of what was believed at the time survives. On the
self-healing issue the banner also records what still holds: the M5 convergence
threshold is undefined and no re-route has been observed on hardware.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant