Skip to content

[New Rule] AWS Backup Recovery Point Lifecycle Modified#6314

Open
bryans3c wants to merge 8 commits into
mainfrom
rule/aws-backup-recovery-point-lifecycle-shortened
Open

[New Rule] AWS Backup Recovery Point Lifecycle Modified#6314
bryans3c wants to merge 8 commits into
mainfrom
rule/aws-backup-recovery-point-lifecycle-shortened

Conversation

@bryans3c

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request

Issue link(s):

Summary - What I changed

Add detection of an AWS Backup recovery point lifecycle via UpdateRecoveryPointLifecycle. The lifecycle controls when a recovery point transitions to cold storage and when it is deleted. Shortening the retention causes recovery points to expire and be deleted automatically, achieving the same anti-recovery outcome as an explicit deletion but in a stealthier, delayed manner that can bypass detections focused on DeleteRecoveryPoint. Adversaries may shorten lifecycle retention to quietly destroy backups. These changes are infrequent and should align with approved retention management.

image

How To Test

Query & data can be assessed in TRADE stack and other telemetry stacks.

Checklist

  • Added a label for the type of pr: bug, enhancement, schema, maintenance, Rule: New, Rule: Deprecation, Rule: Tuning, Hunt: New, or Hunt: Tuning so guidelines can be generated
  • Added the meta:rapid-merge label if planning to merge within 24 hours
  • Secret and sensitive material has been managed correctly
  • Automated testing was updated or added to match the most common scenarios
  • Documentation and comments were added for features that require explanation

Contributor checklist

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

…ml to impact_backup_recovery_point_lifecycle_modified.toml
@bryans3c bryans3c changed the title [New Rule] AWS Backup Recovery Point Lifecycle Shortened [New Rule] AWS Backup Recovery Point Lifecycle Modified Jun 19, 2026
@bryans3c bryans3c requested a review from Copilot June 19, 2026 12:55

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new AWS CloudTrail-based detection rule to identify successful UpdateRecoveryPointLifecycle activity in AWS Backup, which can be used to shorten recovery point retention as an anti-recovery technique.

Changes:

  • Introduces a new production rule for AWS Backup recovery point lifecycle modification events.
  • Includes an investigation guide, false-positive guidance, and MITRE ATT&CK mapping (TA0040 / T1490).
  • Adds a KQL (kuery) query scoped to CloudTrail events from backup.amazonaws.com.

Comment thread rules/integrations/aws/impact_backup_recovery_point_lifecycle_modified.toml Outdated
bryans3c and others added 2 commits June 19, 2026 15:16
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Comment thread rules/integrations/aws/impact_backup_recovery_point_lifecycle_modified.toml Outdated
Comment thread rules/integrations/aws/impact_backup_recovery_point_lifecycle_modified.toml Outdated
bryans3c and others added 3 commits June 22, 2026 10:00
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

@eric-forte-elastic eric-forte-elastic left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Logic and telemetry review. LGTM 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants