docs: fix grammar in basic-python example comment - #259
Closed
Avicennasis wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Member
|
no need for this, we'll be refreshing the examples anyways |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fix 1 grammar slip in an example comment:
take into the account the window border->take into account the window border"take into the account" should be the fixed phrase "take into account".
Note: the identical sentence also appears in
examples/basic-javascript/index.js(line 5). I left it alone to keep this PR to exactly what was reported - happy to include it here if you'd prefer both examples stay in sync.No functional changes - comment only.