Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reject empty reference tokens in JsonPatch #68613
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Reject empty reference tokens in JsonPatch #68613
Changes from all commits
9515c4cFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
per RFC 6901 section 5 both
""and"/"are valid and we accept the first one and reject the latter. Should we acccept both instead?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DeagleGross From the same spec
//is also valid but we are rejecting it.Maybe we should try to be fully compliant then?
The reason I rejected
/is that it essentially means a key which is empty string, which is very similar to//(just that an extra level of nesting).So I would say we either handle empty keys everywhere, or we don't handle empty keys.
For
""it means whole document, not empty key, which is why I viewed it differently.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ye, I imagined we started to treat none of these as errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay. I'll look more into the implementation and the RFC to get it right.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
test
[InlineData("/")]?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could we add an E2E tests for such scenario to not only asssert the exception, but validate what's the HTTP response?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.