[developerz-ai]

What

A coded refusal (ok:false — 'cannot tell' on a shallow or tagless checkout,
'refused' on a bad flag) emits findings and no data key (lib/log.ts drops an
undefined data), so the brief's 'data.reason is not awaiting_tag' test read the
row as healthy exactly where the script could not see. The row is answered only
when ok:true and data.lastTag are present; a refusal is filed, not satisfied.

Acceptance

• health.md:14's Healthy cell states the row is answered only when the release-due JSON has ok: true and a present data.lastTag
• health.md:14 names both refusal shapes — ok: false, findings, no data (summaries cannot tell and refused) — as not answered, never satisfied
• the wording reads data.reason only after the ok:true/data.lastTag guard, and the command cell bun run scripts/release-due.ts --json is unchanged
• no other line of health.md changes; no repo guard reads .dz/briefs/*.md (doc-commands/doc-paths DOC_GLOBS exclude .dz/), so no generated file is affected

Changes

• .dz/briefs/health.md (edit) — Reword line 14's Healthy cell (the "the stamped version is tagged" row). Replace its leading sentence "data.reason is not awaiting_tag." with: "ok: true and data.lastTag present, with data.reason not awaiting_tag — the row is answered only then. A refusal (ok: false, findings and no data: cannot tell on a shallow or tagless checkout, refused on a bad flag) is not answered, never satisfied — file it, with its findings." Leave the command cell and the trailing green-but-untagged sentence unchanged.
• packages/db/src/schema-load.contract.test.ts (edit) — [docs] minor — the comment added at lines 26-27 asserts "120s — the WASM-boot budget test-database.test.ts pins", but this same diff raises test-database.test.ts:20 to PGLITE_BOOT_MS = 300_000, so the cited number is false as the diff lands (staleness this diff caused). Reword lines 26-27 to stop asserting test-database pins 120s: either drop the number and keep the citation ("in line with the WASM-boot budget test-database.test.ts pins") or cite the actual 300s. Keep const BOOT_MS = 120_000 on line 28 unchanged — it still sits ~3x the ~40s real cost the same comment measures.
• packages/jobs/src/queue-wake.job.test.ts (edit) — [docs] minor — the comment added at lines 46-47 asserts "test-database.test.ts budgets the same WASM compile plus initdb at 120s", but this same diff raises test-database.test.ts:20 to PGLITE_BOOT_MS = 300_000, so the cited number is false as the diff lands (staleness this diff caused). Change "at 120s" to "at 300s", or drop the number and cite the file. Keep const PGLITE_BOOT_MS = 120_000 on line 49 unchanged — it stays well above the measured 32-42s boot and matches the ceiling driver-pg-lifecycle.job.test.ts:19 cites from this file.

Verification

bun run verify passed (exit 0) in 52m 18s.

---

🤖 Opened by developerz.ai for task tsk_d0027bc6882510780cfd7286112906b8 on developerz-ai/ultimate.

Raised automatically by the raw_task_triage lane.

🤖 developerz.ai, an automated agent, not a human — this PR is one slice of a stacked plan.
Dispatched automatically by the raw_task_triage lane
Model glm-5.3-flash on api.z.ai via native, funded by account_key
Ran on box hv-dedicated-5
Cost unknown: the box counted 5 model passes but 4 usage reports, so a sum would not be the whole run
Run timeline run_dee58b4cf9074ac485f51f56762246c3
Part 1/1 of plan rtk_bcc7953879b043afb37acb8e93dacf50

[developerz-ai]

Health brief: require ok:true and data.lastTag before reading data.reason

• Picked up
• Surveying the repo — 2026-10-20 21:02 UTC
• Working — 2026-10-21 06:37 UTC
• Pull request opened — docs(health): gate the tagged-version row on ok:true and data.lastTag #824 — 2026-10-21 11:59 UTC
• Done

Work landed on #824 — watching it toward merge.

109h30m · 99 tool calls · 40 messages

Sessions: coding run

---

🤖 developerz.ai, an automated agent, not a human — hv-dedicated-5 (developerz-ai[bot]) · model glm-5.3-flash on api.z.ai

[developerz-ai]

Waiting on our own review of this head, which is taking too long. Nothing is needed from you right now.

• Red on this head: no check is failing
• What was done: The review task for this head is still running past its wait bound.
• What happens next: A stuck review is ended and re-run by the platform; the pull request then moves on.

_{Status for head 9b0df1fbfcf1. This comment is updated in place.}

🤖 Posted by developerz.ai — an automated agent, not a human.