Skip to content

Automated Integration Test Goldens Update from CI - #6603

Open
datacommons-robot-author wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
nl-golden-update-7affa4ff-d9f2-4503-aa55-d0dfaaefd785
Open

Automated Integration Test Goldens Update from CI#6603
datacommons-robot-author wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
nl-golden-update-7affa4ff-d9f2-4503-aa55-d0dfaaefd785

Conversation

@datacommons-robot-author

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This pull request updates the golden files automatically via Cloud Build. Please review the changes carefully. Cloud Build Log

@datacommons-robot-author
datacommons-robot-author requested review from a team and dwnoble and removed request for a team August 21, 2026 16:13
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request contains automated updates to the integration test golden files. These changes primarily involve renaming statistical variables for consistency and minor adjustments to test data configurations. The updates ensure that the integration tests remain aligned with the current data schema.

Highlights

  • Standardization of Statistical Variable Names: Updated multiple chart configuration files to standardize statistical variable names, specifically changing 'Population' to 'Count of Person' and updating capitalization for consistency.
  • Integration Test Data Refresh: Updated various golden files used in integration tests to ensure they match the latest data output from the system.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request primarily standardizes naming conventions across numerous chart_config.json integration test files, renaming "Population" to "Count of Person" (or "Count Of Person") and capitalizing prepositions like "of" to "Of" in chart titles, descriptions, and variable names. It also introduces minor updates to place types, refines comparison places (such as incorporating San Francisco), and adjusts the exploreMore configurations in several test scenarios. There are no review comments provided, so I have no feedback to offer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant