Skip to content

Re-enable fastmemo: 0.1.2 fixes the out-of-date bounds - #8086

Merged
mihaimaruseac merged 1 commit into
commercialhaskell:masterfrom
davidspies:fastmemo-0.1.2
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

Re-enable fastmemo: 0.1.2 fixes the out-of-date bounds#8086
mihaimaruseac merged 1 commit into
commercialhaskell:masterfrom
davidspies:fastmemo-0.1.2

Conversation

@davidspies

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fastmemo was disabled because 0.1.1's bounds predate GHC 9.6+ (base < 4.18, bytestring < 0.12, containers < 0.7).

I've uploaded fastmemo-0.1.2 with relaxed bounds (base < 4.22, bytestring < 0.13, containers < 0.9), which builds and passes its test suite on GHC 9.10.3 (lts-24.54). This PR removes the three stale < 0 constraints.

I'm the maintainer (@davidspies, already listed in the maintainer section).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7WExoJRXb3gjYr8BTnpab

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings August 11, 2026 04:26

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Removes outdated “disabled” build constraints for fastmemo in the Stackage build constraints list, allowing the package to be considered again now that fastmemo-0.1.2 relaxes its upper bounds to support newer snapshots.

Changes:

  • Drops three fastmemo < 0 disable constraints that were tied to fastmemo-0.1.1’s overly restrictive bounds.
  • Leaves the maintainer/package listing intact (so fastmemo remains tracked under its maintainer entry).

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@mihaimaruseac mihaimaruseac left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you

@mihaimaruseac
mihaimaruseac merged commit ff13095 into commercialhaskell:master Aug 11, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants