-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
install: Read --root-ssh-authorized-keys before changing mounts #2476
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ericcurtin
wants to merge
1
commit into
bootc-dev:main
Choose a base branch
from
ericcurtin:install-read-ssh-keys-before-mounts
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+78
−13
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We only ever call this from one thread so I'm sure if the mutex is required. Also, not a fan of this being a global var. We should only ever re-exec when we are installing, so putting this in
prepare_installwould make sense and passing in the vector of env vars toreexec_with_guardenvas anextra_argsparam?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need a mutex or equiv around any
static, no problem with that from my PoV.Yes, but doing it differently would require threading this state from the install code into the lsm code...doable but ugly in a different way.
BTW I would generalize this slightly and e.g.:
_BOOTC_INSTALL_REEXEC_STATEThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kept the global per Colin (threading it from install into lsm was the alternative), but folded the env application together with the argv/argv0 setup into a single
prepare_reexec()used by both re-exec sites, so the duplication there is gone too, plus a unit test.On the memfd/JSON generalization:
set_reexec_envis already generic over key/value, and the only payload today is a small text file, so I left the env approach for now. Happy to move to a memfd-backed struct if we grow more state to carry across re-exec (or if key files near the 128KiB per-env-string limit turn out to be a real concern).